People's Power Furious At 'Civil War Accomplice' Criticism... "Charges and Accusations"

"Civil War Accomplice" to ruling party lawmaker who did not attend vote to lift martial law
People's Power, which strongly protested, demanded disciplinary action at the National Assembly
"Even senior opposition parties who were absent are accomplices."

[Anchor]
When the Democratic Party of Korea accused the ruling party of acting like a "civil war accomplice" from the time of martial law to the prosecution of impeachment, the people's power became angry and officially responded.

Democratic lawmakers who used the expression called for disciplinary action, and said they would also accuse Democrats who did not participate in the vote to lift martial law as accomplices of rebellion.

Reporter Song Jae-in's report.

[Reporter]
At the plenary session of the National Assembly's Legislative and Judiciary Committee, which was held for the first time since the impeachment of President Yoon, the meeting room was turned into a chaos with this remark.

[Kim Yong-min / Democratic Party lawmaker (17th): Many lawmakers conspired to fight this civil war as accomplices like Choo Kyung-ho. That's why we're voting in the National Assembly.... Listen to it! [How dare you accomplices!]
At the time of the resolution to lift the emergency martial law
, the ruling party members who were at the headquarters instead of the National Assembly were referred to as 'civil war accomplices',
The People's Power, which protested with the exit of the
group, demanded a National Assembly disciplinary action against Representative Kim in two days.

[Park Soo-min / People's Power Floor Spokesperson: I filed a complaint with the Ethics Committee because I crossed the ethical line for my fellow lawmaker and the ethical line for my lawmaker]

If the Democratic Party of Korea's logic is the case, senior opposition parties who were not in the plenary session also launched a counterattack, saying they would accuse them of being accomplices of rebellion.

[Choi Hyung-doo / People's Power: Were the senior Democratic Party members aware of the civil war in advance if there was no evidence that it was seen in the plenary session of the National Assembly or anywhere in the company? Were you aware of martial law in advance? Is that why you ran away?]

When the Democratic Party of Korea brought up the expression '∀' saying that the people's power attitude was the same not only during martial law but also throughout the impeachment phase,

[Park Chan-dae / Floor Leader of the Democratic Party of Korea: (The People's Power) rejected the National Assembly's impeachment rights meeting, the Constitutional Court's special committee meeting, and even personnel hearings. If we don't quickly put down the rebellion's continuing rattling...]

The power of the people was once again infuriated by commentary.

Even though he said several times that the emergency martial law was wrong, he said that he would put on a "civil war party" frame, and that he would not be able to peel off the image of the "crime advocacy party" that bulletproofs representative Lee Jae-myung.

However, there have been many remarks within the ruling party that they agree with President Yoon's ground for martial law or claim that he cannot be subject to judicial review.

Some point out that the party should first apologize to the public in order to appeal to no longer use the expression of an accomplice in rebellion.

I'm Song Jaein of YTN.

Reporter for filming
: Lee Sung-mo Han Sang-won
Video editing: Im Jong-moon
Design: Lee Ga-eun