Lee Jae-myung's first trial was acquitted..."To interpret it as a perjury-requesting conversation" [Y transcript]

■ Host: Anchor Na Kyung-chul, anchor Lee Se-na
■ Starring: Lawyer Park Sung-bae, lawyer Lim Joo-hye

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN New Square 2PM] when quoting.

◇Anchor> Representative Lee Jae-myung was acquitted in the first trial of perjury teacher charges. I think CEO Lee Jae-myung will appear a little later. As he is innocent, it is expected that he will reveal his position in front of the camera. Looking at the contents of the court now, it has not been decided whether or not to testify at the time of the call. And even if you look at Kim Jin-sung's testimony individually, it cannot be seen as a perjury teacher. These are the things that are being delivered.

The court's remarks continued to be delivered to the effect of innocence. The court judged that the preparation of the witness examination with the lawyer lacked evidence that representative Lee Jae-myung was involved. Even if we gather all these testimonies, it seems that representative Lee Jae-myung's innocence has now been decided by combining these details. There are a lot of prospects for guilt right now. What do you think about this judgment?

◆Im Joo-hye> If you were acquitted of this part, I think the direction could have been completely different depending on how you interpret the call. Looking at the details of the call, the court seems to have seen that it cannot be interpreted as the purpose of asking Lee Jae-myung to speak just because he mentioned some statements about the direction he wanted. So if you tell me that you heard, it's good to say that you heard this fact, this collusion, or remarks aimed at driving me to be a criminal, and even if there was a list like this, even if there was a conversation like this, this itself did not force Kim Jin-sung to make a statement according to the content. I think that's how I saw it.

And it seems to have been emphasized that it was a legitimate exercise of defense rights. Lawyers can also ask for favorable witnesses to testify, such as favorable or unfavorable witnesses. In the process, I may not be able to give you a guide to some extent, but in terms of mentioning these parts, Lee Jae-myung did not give a guide to any testimony in terms of the exercise of defense rights, but he did not teach you the direction he wanted. I think I focused on these parts.

Excerpted from
: Lee Eun-bi, editor of the digital news team

#YRecord