"The biggest humiliation for Kim Jong Un." North Korea is now beyond Trump's interest? [Y Record]

■ Host: Anchor Lee Eun-sol, Anchor Jeong Jin-hyung
■ Starring: YTN International Reporter Yoon Hyun-sook, Chair Researcher at the Korea Institute for Unification Cho Han-beom

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News Special Adviser - 47th U.S. President Trump Elected] when quoting.

◇ Anchor> Who more did North Korea want?

◆ Cho Han-beom> I don't think there was a person I especially preferred. Because some say Trump, Trump, but Trump has given Kim the greatest humiliation. I took a 60-hour train to Hanoi, and I expected an agreement, with a smile. But it broke and made me fall into deep frustration. Although he got acquainted, in fact, it was Trump who made Kim Jong-un in the most trouble. And President Trump himself says it's bargaining power, but what should I say, the question of breaking trust. Because of that problem, I don't think Harris would have seen it badly either. Because we took out the complete denuclearization that happened four years ago on the platform that the Democratic Party announced before the election. I took out human rights, too. This means negotiating with North Korea. So there must have been no particular likes or dislikes. I think he decided that after the presidential election, he would come to negotiations to prevent North Korea's nuclear capabilities and its nuclear attack capabilities against the United States. I think that's what they're thinking right now. So I'll wait now, to a certain extent. However, if this expectation is broken or negotiated and no results have been achieved, then a nuclear test or an ICBM normal angle will be launched. Before that, we will have a pause for a considerable period of time. Look at it like this.

◇Anchor> You would not have supported a specific candidate in the U.S. presidential election. Is there a chance that Trump will meet with Kim Jong Un again? What kind of strategy do you expect to implement?

◆ Cho Han-beom> There's a possibility. However, it is not easy to do this series, which was unprecedentedly spectacular in the first period, followed by Singapore, followed by Hanoi and Panmunjom. Because North Korea's nuclear weapons are already more advanced than then, and North Korea's nuclear weapons are now advanced to the point where it is difficult to use the term complete denuclearization. And the other thing is the Russo-Western War, more importantly. Israel-Hamas, something bigger. We're a little disappointed, but unfortunately, from the perspective of the United States, the EU, the Russo-Western War, is the first priority, and the Middle East is the second priority. It's our third one. Then there is no reason for President Trump to meet Kim Jong-un as a priority. You're going to get involved in the Russo-Western War first, and then you're going to want to get involved in Israel-Hamas.

◇Anchor> There will also be a problem of sending troops to Russia, but in fact, Trump will end the war with a phone call within 24 hours if he is elected. I've been raving like this. How will this develop?

◆Jo Han-beom> I can finish it in an hour. We can't fight because we're not going to provide weapons to Ukraine anymore. This is not the way to end it. President Trump is talking about that. I will stop providing weapons to Ukraine. Then you can't go to war, number one. Then it's forced to end. Then I'll tell Putin because I'm close to President Putin. You don't attack and you won't give me weapons here, this is the forced end. But is this the right way? This doesn't solve anything. But it's forced to stop at this line, and one day it's going to explode again. That's what President Trump will do. Pressuring Ukraine into a forced ceasefire, with land taken away. And then Putin is good. He wants to cease fire in this state. So I'm sorry for the Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian nationalists, but it's not a complete end to the war in Ukraine. However, the possibility of a forced ceasefire has increased considerably. Russia wants to have a ceasefire now, it really wants a ceasefire in this state. under the occupation of territory So now it's the Zelensky government that wants to continue the war with Ukraine. But if you reduce the energy supply here, weapons energy. Then we have no choice but to force a ceasefire. The U.S. wants to do it, and Russia wants to do it. However, only the Zelensky government and Ukrainians want to restore the territory, and President Trump's plan is to stop supplying weapons. And tell Putin not to attack more. However, it is easy to force a cease-fire of war, but is this a reasonable end? In the end, Putin wins in large part. That's the problem that's left.

Excerpted from
: Lee Mi-young, editor of the digital news team

#YRecord