While the Democratic Party of Korea has decided to submit an amendment to the Special Prosecutor's Act for Kim Gun-hee, it seems to continue to put pressure on representative Han Dong-hoon.
Rep. Han Min-soo of the Democratic Party mentioned in an interview this morning that representative Han Dong-hoon seemed to be scared after meeting with the president.
He insisted on the public eye level and emphasized that there was no sanctuary before the law, but eventually raised the level of criticism, saying he changed his attitude. Let's listen to it.
[Han Min-soo / Democratic Party member (YTN News Fighting): You had that meeting with the president last time. said to be the culmination of a lush conflict You all know that table. CEO Han persistently asked to change the table to a round table in order to change it to a spacious one. That's even reported. Maybe after that, I think one representative got scared. To President Yoon, President Yoon is someone I can't reach or never change. After that, it changes drastically like when it happened. Take a look. He insists on the public's perspective, and there is no sanctuary before the law against First Lady Kim Gun-hee. The person who kept insisting has gradually changed since then, and the cause has used it. The press conference of the president's public statement has not changed. But first, I was scared to change my position 180 degrees under the pretext of that. Second, let's not get caught in the so-called traitorous frame.]
Rep. Jang Dong-hyuk, a member of the close Dong-hoon community, refuted that his position on the presidential office has not changed.
There is still regret over the presidential statement, but he explained that it is time to wait for results.
Now, Han emphasized that he is planning a strategy to focus on the basin offensive.
[Jang Dong-hyuk / Supreme Council Member of the People's Power (MBC Kim Jong-bae's attention) : I don't think it's right to say that the stance in relation to the presidential office has changed. Personally, I don't think the contents of President Yoon Suk Yeol's statement contained as much as I said on other broadcasts. But CEO Han Dong-hoon seems to think so. The discourse is not the end, but the beginning of change. So it's just started, but rather than continuing to confront and set up angles here, there's not much time left for Lee Jae-myung's sentence and the perjury teacher's sentence, so in the meantime, the president's office needs time to produce results and promote it. I think we're planning a strategy now to focus on the offensive of the basin with the forces that have been scattered during that time waiting for that time.
However, the pro-Yoon-gye's offensive against the pro-Yoon-gye seems to continue.
Pro-Yoon-gye figures recently wrote on the bulletin board of the People's Power Party criticizing President Yoon and his wife in the name of Han and Han's family, arguing that a party audit should be launched.
Let's listen to representative pro-Yoon-gye Kwon Sung-dong.
[Kwon Seong-dong / National People's Power (Channel A Political Signal)] It's not just one or two cases, but I heard that there were hundreds or thousands of cases. There were such criticisms against the president and his wife, such as insulting comments. So when this problem arises, shouldn't the party leadership first conduct a party audit to eliminate the source of this dispute? Would the party leadership have responded so lukewarmly if they said there was a swear word against representative Han Dong-hoon? Isn't it that there is a lot of abusive language against the president or colleagues on such a party bulletin board in the party, and it was registered as the family name of CEO Han Dong-hoon or CEO Han Dong-hoon anyway? On the party's bulletin board? Then, from Han's point of view, it is right for him to quickly reveal this part even to be proud of himself. There's no reason to be misunderstood, right?]
※ 'Your report becomes news'
[Kakao Talk] YTN Search and Add Channel
[Phone] 02-398-8585
[Mail] social@ytn.co.kr
[Copyright holder (c) YTN Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution and use of AI data prohibited]