Kim Yong-hyun, who asked back, "What kind of people would tolerate it?" He proposed the declaration of martial law himself? [Y Record]

■ Host: Kim Sun-young Anchor
■ Starring: Kim Hyung-joo, Special Professor at Semyung University, Shin Ji-ho, Vice President of Strategic Planning for People's Power,

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News Special] when quoting.


◇ Anchor> It seems that the atmosphere inside the power of the people is turning strangely. In fact, when Kim Min-seok, the supreme council member of the Democratic Party of Korea, talked about martial law a few months ago, many people wonder, why do they keep saying this? I had this reaction. This was also mentioned at the hearing of Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun. Let's hear the story from that time again.

[Kim Min-seok / Supreme Council Member of the Minjoo Party (August 21): My well-founded conviction is that the core of the recent administrations, leading to the sudden replacement of the defense minister of the opposition and the president's unexpected remarks on anti-state forces, is a martial law preparation operation with local warfare and the creation of a north wind in mind. I hope you give up your martial law build-up play with fire in case of impeachment. We will certainly defeat the attempt to prepare for martial law. ]

[Chou Mi-ae / Minjoo Party of Korea (last September): We are establishing a pro-government system to prepare for martial law, so I don't think it's groundless. Candidate Kim Yong-hyun, who is known for his due diligence in the military under the Yoon Suk Yeol administration, is involved in the school relationship. It's Chungam High School. Six accidents. It is diagnosed that so-called Kim Yong-hyun's three major warlords are being formed, centering on 38 working trainers and water radiation. It can be summarized as the 38th heyday water defense commercialization of the famous Chungampa Army Academy.

[Kim Yong-hyun / Minister of National Defense Candidate (last September): If martial law is done in the situation of our Republic of Korea, which people would tolerate it? And will you comply with our military? I don't think I'll pour it. To be honest, this kind of martial law issue doesn't fit the times right now. I think so.]

[Park Sun-won / Minjoo Party of Korea (last September): Lee Jin-woo, Special Forces commander Kwak Jong-geun, and female counterintelligence commander were recently called Hannam-dong diplomatic missions, right? What did you say at the entrance to the security guard's guide so that you wouldn't leave a record of access? Didn't you talk about martial law?]

[Kim Yong-hyun / Defense Minister Candidate (September): I don't think it's a place to falsely incite and political incitement with things that are not true.]

◇ Anchor> What kind of people would accept it? Isn't it known that Minister Kim Yong-hyun, who responded like this, has now proposed declaring martial law?

◆Kim Hyung-joo> It's probably a fait accompli. If so, you can't trust the defense minister if you said that at an official hearing and made such a suggestion as it is reported now. And that position itself is not an individual position. It could be the president's position. Because the minister's answer to the minister's hearing itself is not an individual answer. as it represents the answer of this Government as a whole. If so, the president declared martial law last night and said, "Please trust me," and which people would trust the president and the defense minister? Aren't the people who have a president and a defense minister who are not trusted by the people unfortunate people? In fact, the president and the defense minister are the ones we can trust and follow the most when there is a national crisis, an accident, or a war, and they can no longer be recognized for their own legitimacy to say that they lied like that.

◇Anchor> Listening to last September, we can't confirm whether that's the right information or not, but isn't it right that Chungam faction is appearing in the process of declaring martial law now?

◆Shin Ji-ho> That's an undeniable reality. Didn't the Democratic Party of Korea confirm this suspicion, such as the suspicion? When Supreme Council member Kim Min-seok talked about it, I felt that a member of the National Assembly was so irresponsible, it was ridiculous, and it was President Yoon Suk Yeol who proved that he was right. What an irony. That's what I think. Then, yesterday, the main reason for the declaration of emergency martial law was the quasi-action of anti-state forces. Surreal in this way, 45 years of emergency martial law. This emergency martial law, which does not meet the requirements and has procedural defects, is 150 minutes until the National Assembly. It's actually been suppressed. Since it was suppressed, I don't know exactly who the anti-state forces that President Yoon Suk Yeol wanted to fight were, but they made them more active. So it's just ridiculous how you came up with this surreal and anachronistic idea.

◇Anchor> Anti-state forces' quasi-dong. But hasn't it been a while since Yoon Suk Yeol Yoon Seok-yeol used the term anti-state forces? In this context, then the card of martial law was not spontaneous, but was it thought of for a long time? I think there's also a view like this.

◆ Kim Hyung-joo> Well, I don't know how long ago it was.Ma said yesterday, for example, the president asked me to trust him as his last remarks. But you went to Gongju the day before yesterday, so you trust me, right? That's what I said. It's hard to say that we've been preparing for that long, but we started having those discussions last weekend or early this week, I feel like that. So, I'm asking you to believe that one of the important words in martial law or impeachment is betrayal of the people. So he must have had his own anxiety about that. However, such talk is really the arrogance of Peter Drucker's ignorance, which makes me incompetent. That's how you look at it. In other words, I am the good and I am the reform, but those who did not follow me are anti-state forces and pro-North Korean leftists, and they will be trapped in this frame in the future. So I only talk about people who fit the rhythm, so yes, let's do it. That's what happens. So who do you want to catch as a result? Politicians, do not engage in politics. Bring the doctors back. Journalists, get censored again. Isn't that what it is? What's that? So through this opportunity, in fact, who has the president been discussing with? There's no senior secretary for political affairs in the presidential office for reporters to ask about this case last night, and we can't talk on the phone. Even the ruling party doesn't know. Then who is the president talking to? As a result of this, there was a misjudgment that did not gain public consensus and a misjudgment. That's how I see it.

Excerpted from
: Lee Mi-young, editor of the digital news team

#YRecord