[YTN Radio News Fighting Bae Seunghee]
□ Broadcasting: FM 94.5 (07:15 - 09:00)
□ Broadcast date and time: November 28, 2024 (Thursday)
□ Host: Attorney Bae Seung-hee
□ Starter: Kim Yong-tae, Congressman of the People's Power
* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.
[YTN Radio <News Fighting, Bae Seunghee]> Please reveal that it's about the interview.
◆ Attorney Bae Seung-hee (hereinafter referred to as Bae Seung-hee): I'm Bae Seung-hee, the news fighting. I'm sorry for the young man in the third part. Young Kim Yong-tae, a member of the People's Power, is here. Hello,
◇Kim Yong-tae, Member of the People's Power (hereinafter referred to as Kim Yong-tae): Hello, I'm Kim Yong-tae, Gapyeong, Pocheon, Gyeonggi Province.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes, since you're 100 years old, you've subtracted minus 20 and shown the power of the boy Kim Yong-tae, not the youth. That's amazing. I envy you. However, the party was raided yesterday in connection with allegations that lawmaker Myung Tae-kyun interfered in the nomination. How is it? How is the mood?
◇Kim Yong-tae: It's embarrassing. Anyway, I'm sure it was legally done by the investigative agency under the warrant, but since we're the ruling party, I'm a little embarrassed about the sudden search and seizure of the warrant. One concern is that this nomination has an autonomous aspect of the party, and there are some fundamental concerns about how to judge it as an investigation and a law.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes. At that time, if it was a by-election on the 6th, the party leader was Lee Joon-seok. Also, isn't the chairman of the delegation committee Yoon Sang-hyun and the chairman of the local election delegation committee Jeong Jin-seok the current head of the department? I think these people will be the subject of investigation, what do you think?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I think I've seen it in the media, saying that the investigative agency will investigate it for reference if necessary, but if there's anything I need to cooperate with, I'll cooperate. But I think I keep getting confused, but the process is a little different after nominating for local elections and by-elections for lawmakers. So, for the nomination of local elections, the head of the local government is to nominate from 17 municipal and provincial parties per city and province, and I would like to tell you that the process is a little different for the central party to do it anyway.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Then the focus is on the parliamentary by-elections. Now.
◇ Kim Yong-tae: I don't know. It depends on the direction of the investigation...
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Because we did the National Assembly with the central headquarters of the National Assembly.
◇ Kim Yong-tae: Yes, as far as I know, we raided and searched this keynote and organizing bureau in our party.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: I see. There's a lot of news about the party. This time, the public opinion team, which CEO Han Dong-hoon operated when he was the Minister of Justice, has launched another investigation. In addition, Rep. Yang Moon-seok is saying, "Shouldn't we do an independent counsel?" How do you see this part?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I don't know. I think that's too much to say in the current situation. So, nothing has been revealed yet, but the Democratic Party of Korea should conduct another special investigation. You should change your name to the special prosecutor's office. It's a little embarrassing because it's a special prosecutor's office. As a result, this part is now connected to the issue of the party's bulletin board, and as various conflicting aspects spread within the party, I think it can give an excuse for the opposition's attack, but I think we need to cut it off and go.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: What should CEO Han Dong-hoon do to hang up?
◇Kim Yong-tae: For me, the politicization of politics and justice is also very dangerous. In the end, it threatens our democracy, so I think politicians should be wary of the judicialization of politics. I think the judicialization of politics starts from there, thinking that there is no problem with the law, or things that are beyond the common sense of people's will. So, in that case, it's the beginning of some kind of politics to match certain common sense or things, but I think it's a good idea to put politics in line with the law. Of course, you can make healthy criticisms on the party board. And I think your family can really criticize you. However, this continues to lead to conflict and conflict within the party. It seems that neglecting this and crushing it has led to a never-so-good situation for the representative or the leadership in this situation. If that happens, I think it's necessary for the CEO to just mention the facts and break up and move on. Because otherwise, some people will continue to try to raise this problem, and I don't think it will have a good effect on the CEO if it grows.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: CEO Han Dong-hoon should make his position clear. Are you talking about this?
◇Kim Yong-tae: Personally, I think it's necessary to reveal the current situation.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Isn't the family's name theirs?
◇Kim Yong-tae: You're the representative because all the media are now interested and many party members are interested. I need you to give me some facts about this. That's what I'm thinking. At first, when there was this controversy at our general meeting about two to three weeks ago, many lawmakers were not actually interested. Since we were in the parliamentary inspection today and the budget settlement of the Budget and Accounts Committee, everyone is busy, but I think the situation has changed a little. Since there is no proper word on this suspicion, many lawmakers don't want to think that this is really a problem or that their families posted it, but various speculations have begun to be mass-produced. It started to spread. I don't think that's good for representative leadership at all.
◆Bae Seung-hee: And on the report at first glance. President Yoon's slander article was posted every seven minutes by his mother-in-law and his mother-in-law. So it's a guess that this seven-minute interval is what kind of tool was used in the end. If this is the case, this is what can be seen as manipulation of public opinion.
◇ Kim Yong-tae: That's why I think we need to stop it with a phlegm, but I don't think these meaningless and unwanted thoughts would have spread if the representative had told the party members and the people the truth when this was suspected earlier. As I mentioned on the last broadcast, I think politics has a characteristic of trying to shake whenever there is a gap and trying to shake whenever there is a weakness, but since the representative has not mentioned it, people who keep trying to build up their weaknesses are also trying to shake it. So, I would like to emphasize that this is never good for representative leadership because thoughts that I don't even want to think about continue to spread, as the anchor pointed out now, which is never good.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: I should have told you that the text was in the name of my mother-in-law and mother-in-law, but the text of the mother-in-law and mother-in-law is every seven minutes, and from the councilor's point of view, other people's names were posted every minute. It's being analyzed again like this. Do you think you wrote these parts yourself?
◇Kim Yong-tae: So if you change it, I think you're saying whether you turned the macro or not. So, the essence of this problem starts with the suspicion that your family posted it or not, but I think you need to give me an answer to this, so I don't think I've gone that far yet. And my family will be able to upload it. But as suspicions continue to spread, it seems like we're going to the macro. I'm not sure. I think so.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Then I would have written it myself.
◇Kim Yong-tae: Wouldn't it be used when you criticized or criticized? Wouldn't it be like that if you think about it personally in common sense?
◆Bae Seung-Hee: Regarding this, Shin Ji-ho, the head of the Strategic Planning Department, said, First, First Lady Kim Gun-hee's aunt wrote a curse. But we didn't make that a problem. They're reacting like this. How do you see this reaction?
◇ Kim Yong-tae: So, as we continue to engage in an emotional fight, it's not like elementary school students fighting, and if we continue to refute like this, I don't think the people around the CEO are in a good direction for Lee's leadership. So if you continue to approach politics engineered and technologically, I don't think this problem can be solved.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Since Supreme Council member Kim Min-seok spoke publicly, CEO Han Dong-hoon immediately protested, asking him to check the facts and speak, and these images were revealed. This kind of public disclosure, Kim Min-jeon, is the best. What do you think about the public clash at the top? Isn't former Supreme Council member Kim Min enough to speak?
◇Kim Yong-tae: When I think about it when I was the supreme council member, I don't think I've even started a fight yet. Compared to then, I think the CEO should establish the highest authority. Of course, it is the seat where the representatives and supreme council members have the right to speak. Of course, the supreme council members can say it to the representative, and of course, the representative can say it to the supreme council members. However, if the rest of the party officials present there are going to speak, you have to get the right to speak to the representative. But in the end, the representative has to take care of situations that are not. The society of the Supreme Council, however, is not very pleasant for the people to see this mixed and conflicted pattern.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: In the end, this is also a matter of the leadership of the party leader.
◇Kim Yong-tae: The representative needs to correct the party's discipline because it can be seen like that again.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes. In this regard, former Supreme Council member Kim Min's argument is like this. They are asking us to make it look like public opinion has been formed through the bulletin board, and to clarify our position on whether it was reported and we did this with it, but with this, the Special Prosecutor Act is still coming out, right? What kind of intent should I say?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I personally think that you can say that because you are a member of the Supreme Council. The party's supreme council member cooperates with the representative, but sometimes the role of checking the representative is also the role of the supreme council member, so I think former lawmaker Kim Min may have said it on the premise that the suspicion should be cleared up as I said earlier, rather than to attack the representative. This is because the conflict between the two sides will become more pronounced if this continues to be handed over in a way that says, "What kind of malice is there?"
◆ Bae Seung-hee: CEO Han Dong-hoon sees it as killing himself. Do you think so?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I think the CEO can feel that way about this issue. As you said, as the controversy over the multi-disciplinary bulletin board continues to spread and the facts that have not yet been revealed are speculated, the representative can naturally feel that it is some kind of maneuver to shake him, but in other words, I think it is very important for the representative to answer this suspicion quickly for himself or herself to keep his balance.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: I see. In fact, there was scheduled to be a re-voting of the Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor Act today, but the ruling and opposition parties agreed to change it to the 10th. There are also predictions that the opposition party will bring about a split vote due to the contents of the party's bulletin board. How's the party atmosphere?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I don't know. There is no atmosphere in which this is linked to the Kim Gun-hee independent counsel law, as expected or speculated by the media about the party's bulletin board. I personally feel the same way. Because, again, I don't think there will be any ruling party lawmakers who will agree to push for the opposition alone without an agreement, although the special prosecution can only be passed if it is agreed upon by the ruling and opposition parties. I think this is a little different from that feeling.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes, the passport mentioned this single treatment, but some people said that everyone should abstain because they were concerned about the departure vote.
◇ Kim Yong-tae: Someone could have suggested that, but it may be necessary for the party's strategy, but personally, I would like to think that it is not a desirable direction for a member of the National Assembly.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: There will be all the votes against it. What about this time?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I think that the level of the previous level will be rejected at that level because some lawmakers may have the same idea.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: I see. I see. Then I'll ask you again about the suspicion of intervening in the nomination in relation to the police. This time, the issue of Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon is also emerging. Daegu Mayor Hong Joon Pyo criticizes Oh Se-hoon to stop putting pollack on him. Do I have to believe all the suspicions of Lee Myung-tae-kyun and the stories that come out of his mouth?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I don't know how much we can trust because Myung Tae-kyun says so many things and according to you, the world feels like you made it yourself, but I don't know. I don't know if such a poll by Myung Tae-kyun was actually conducted, but even if it was done, I don't think it won Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon. At that time, Mayor Oh Se-hoon had a reason to be elected and many citizens thought so, so he chose Mayor Oh Se-hoon, but I don't think it was because of such a poll by Myung. I don't think there's any need to shake it.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes. The Democratic Party of Korea is now proposing a revision to the election law as it is found guilty of violating the Public Official Election Act in connection with representative Lee Jae-myung. How do you watch this?
◇ Kim Yong-tae: It's like that great man's theory. So who would say if you'd normally discussed or discussed serious ideas about the Public Official Election Act? However, anyone can see that the situation that Lee Jae-myung will revise the Public Official Election Act after he is guilty will not be passed, but I think it is one of the loyal competitions within the Democratic Party to look good to Lee Jae-myung.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Yes. This time, the Democratic Party of Korea will hold a prosecutor impeachment hearing that investigated Kang Vaccine and Um Hee-joon, the representative of prosecutor Lee Jae-myung. The Daejangdong charges are being tried now, so wouldn't it affect the trial again if there was an impeachment hearing?
◇Kim Yong-tae: I don't think I can do it. I don't think I'll be able to hold a hearing. What would you do if the Democratic Party really had a word of shame at the end? Isn't it so? Prosecutors who investigated representative Lee Jae-myung or prosecutors who investigated the Democratic Party of Korea are impeached and held hearings.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: They're holding a hearing.
◇ Kim Yong-tae: So, as I said earlier, it's just an expression of polar lawmakers to compete for loyalty to Representative Lee Jae-myung, but would they actually do it? In fact, the Democratic Party should give up the party in charge.
◆Bae Seung-hee: Aren't you saying that on December 4th, you will vote on the impeachment motion against the suspect investigation line related to First Lady Kim Gun-hee, including Lee Chang-soo? I think this part will go ahead.
◇Kim Yong-tae: I think that's a bit different from what I said just before, but since it's the opposition party, it seems that they are trying to do it with the justification that they will do it in terms of the separation of powers in terms of checks against a certain administration or investigation authority, but he also has a political aspect. In the current situation, Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the Democratic Party of Korea, said he would do some muksanism and take care of people's livelihoods, but in reality, It continues to provoke confrontation between camps and I think the Democratic Party is at its peak.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: If the impeachment motion is passed, I think it will be very confusing. Prosecutors are continuing to protest now, so how will the people's power react?
◇Kim Yong-tae: Since the Democratic Party is in the majority, we can push it with strength, right? But if we get impeached again like that, I don't think the Democratic Party can move on as an authorized party. The people are all watching.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: Also, CEO Lee Jae-myung has been on the offensive since he was acquitted as a perjury teacher, and even he is accusing Lee Myung-tae-kyun of salami. But the investigation is underway. Oh, Myung Taekyun?
◇Kim Yong-tae: That's right.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: But the prosecution couldn't find Lee Myung-tae-kyun's cell phone. In addition to this, Rep. Park Eun-jung of the Cho Kuk Innovation Party insists on the seizure and search of the president's couple's phone, so how about this?
◇Kim Yong-tae: If you cut off the question a little while ago and answer it, Lee Jae-myung's Representative Public Official Election Act was convicted, and now the perjury charge came out in the first trial. But when I see the Democratic Party acting as if judicial risk is gone, I'm like a Jammo. I gave them three bananas in the morning and four bananas in the evening. Then I'll give them four in the morning and three in the evening. Are you saying you just liked them? So, I don't understand the Democratic Party, which acts as if everything is innocent when there are many mountains to go over. Second, regarding Myung Tae-kyun, I don't know. I think we need to think twice about confiscating and searching the cell phones of the head of state based on such suspicions. How much information in the phone is there that only a national security president should know? However, if there is a clear need for such an investigation, it will be necessary to do it in an investigation situation, but I personally think that the investigative agency should also carefully judge the seizure and search of the president's cell phone only with explicit one-sided claims.
◆ Bae Seung-hee: It's because I'm requesting a warrant from the court. I also think the court will decide. Did you have a hard time today? You have to cheer up. I'm on my way to work. Young man, I'm sorry. Let's stop listening today. So far, I've been with Kim Yong-tae, a member of the People's Power.
◇Kim Yong-tae: Thank you.
[Copyright holder (c) YTN Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution and use of AI data prohibited]