[News NIGHT] "It's hard to attend the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit on the 25th".President's Office Receives 'Hand Letter' From College Students

■ Hosted by: anchor Sung Moon-gyu
■ Starring: Eom Kyung-young, director of the Center for Spiritual Research in the Age, Park Won-seok, former lawmaker of the Justice Party

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN NewsNIGHT] when quoting.

[Anchor]
It's a focus night time to look at news of political interest. Today, Eom Kyung-young, the head of the Institute for Spiritual Research in the Era, and Park Won-seok, a former member of the Justice Party, came Please come in. Wasn't the way here a little different today?

[Strict Management]
It was very cold.

[Anchor]
It's the day before Christmas.

[Strict Management]
It didn't seem to have the Christmas Eve vibe. It doesn't seem to have a Christmas atmosphere at all.

[Anchor]
That's what I'm saying. Even before Christmas, today's theme is not that light. I'll start with the news about President Yoon's investigation. Seok Dong-hyun, a lawyer close to President Yoon, expressed his position that it is difficult to attend the investigation of the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit scheduled for tomorrow. We'll listen to your voice.

[Seok Dong-hyun / Yoon Suk Yeol Presidential Legal Advisory: I think it is difficult to attend tomorrow (25th). I'll tell you that the conditions haven't been met yet. With the impeachment proceedings at least partially stranded and the president's basic position as a respondent to the impeachment trial explained to the Constitutional Court and to the public, it should be explained first.... ]

[Anchor]
The conditions have not yet been met. In particular, he reiterated his position that impeachment proceedings come first yesterday. How did you like it? This is the first time that President

[Strict Management]
Yoon has made his position clear on the investigation into the emergency martial law incident and the impeachment trial of the Constitutional Court. I will actively respond to the impeachment trial and lead to the dismissal. Also, if the dismissal is brought out, the charges of unconstitutional controversy or rebellion can be cleared. If this happens, the need for investigation itself decreases. I made this position clear. And in fact, the investigation into martial law is not complicated right now. The investigation into former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun, who is getting very close to a substantive statement and is suspected of having a critical mission of insurrection, should be conducted to some extent to lead to the investigation of President Yoon. So, I don't think there is much benefit in summoning President Yoon right away. So, it can be at a level that can soothe public anger because of the great public anger, but it is difficult to arrest and prosecute through President Yoon's investigation. And in fact, President Yoon is now in violation of his official residence and has been banned from leaving the country. So I believe that after conducting the investigation reasonably, we need to conduct door-to-door investigations right away. And I think that if the impeachment trial is cited, then it can go into a full-fledged criminal arrest procedure.

[Anchor]
You've said it all the time. Lawyer Seok Dong-hyun expressed this expression. It is necessary to first explain the president's position to the judges and the people. For this purpose, he said that the impeachment trial of the Constitutional Court comes first.

[Park Won-seok]
They say the impeachment trial takes precedence over the investigation, but I think it's very deceptive in itself. If the impeachment trial takes precedence over the investigation, why would you not receive documents related to the impeachment trial by the Constitutional Court three times and consider it to have been served by the Constitutional Court as a result and proceed with the process? The hearing preparation period begins on the 27th, but it seems that he will not submit an answer, and a lawyer has not been appointed. In the end, the impeachment trial is showing signs of trying to delay with another response logic. It is also not true that the impeachment trial takes precedence over the investigation. If so, you should have faithfully worked on the impeachment proceedings, but that's not it, is it? However, he still seems to think that he enjoys and should enjoy the privilege of criminal fluoridation. But haven't you attracted the crime of civil war and even foreign exchange? The president's privilege to remove fluoride does not apply in a situation where foreign exchange attraction is also suspected. Therefore, you cannot control the investigative agency's request for attendance and compulsory investigation. And you can say that they are accomplices and accomplices of this rebellion. All the key mission workers have been arrested. However, I think that not securing the president of Yoon Suk Yeol, who is marked as the leader of the rebellion, is a kind of recognition of privilege, so it cannot happen. I believe that if you refuse to comply with the investigative agency's attendance like this, you should immediately obtain an arrest warrant or apply for an arrest warrant or enter into a compulsory investigation process.

[Anchor]
Anyway, I think the lawyers will be appointed soon in the future. Since he said he will officially make his position the day after tomorrow, do you think there is a possibility that President Yoon will come forward and explain himself after that?

[Strict Management]
If you look at it now, it can be seen that some of the supporters are gathering. This is because President Yoon's approval rating is two or three times higher than that of former President Park Geun Hye's impeachment in 2016, and the public's approval rating is twice as high as then. In fact, after the resignation of Han Dong-hoon, President Yoon seems to have become a real focal point of the conservative ruling party. In that sense, President Yoon's strategy seems to be in this position that he will seek to dismiss the impeachment trial as much as possible against the backdrop of his supporters. However, it has not officially submitted the appointment of the lawyers. But if you look at today's report, isn't it that you can't find a working lawyer? So lawyer Seok Dong-hyun is acting as a spokesperson. Since the Constitutional Court has also designated a hearing preparation date from the 27th, I expect President Yoon's side to respond to the Constitutional Court in earnest after Christmas.

[Anchor]
Lawyer Seok Dong-hyun mentioned the case of former President Park Geun Hye. What he said was that he would receive an impeachment trial first, and that former President Park was also investigated after the impeachment trial. Can we see this on the same line? Because of this point. What do you think?

[Park Won-seok]
First of all, to clarify the facts, former President Park Geun Hye's investigation process began first. The impeachment trial took place later.

[Anchor]
Are you talking about the special counsel?

[Park Won-seok]
He was indicted on 13 charges, and the charges are equivalent to the privilege of fluoridation, so even if he is suspended as long as he maintains his presidency. That's why the investigation was conducted after he was dismissed from the presidency through an impeachment trial. However, as I said earlier, the crimes committed by President Yoon Suk Yeol now are crimes that do not qualify as fluoridation privileges. Therefore, regardless of the impeachment proceedings, police or investigative agencies can conduct investigations regardless of the presidency. Compared to then, it is only President Yoon Suk Yeol's argument that the investigation should be stopped until the impeachment trial is over, and it is not a reference for the investigative agency at all.

[Strict Management]
But it was the same during Park Geun Hye's presidency. As far as I can remember, the prosecution's investigation began in mid-October and then on October 24, so October 24, 2016. As JTBC reported Choi Soon-sil's tablet PC, the prosecution began an investigation in earnest. And on December 9th, the impeachment bill of President Park Geun Hye passed the National Assembly, and since then, he has raided the Blue House and received voluntary data submission. Then the Constitutional Court dismissed former President Park Geun Hye on March 10, and he was arrested 20 days later. If you look at it that way, it remains very similar now, and lawmaker Park said that the privilege to remove fluoride is not recognized, but that's what you say when you're accused of rebellion. And the contents of Roh Sang-won's former intelligence commander's notebook have not yet been revealed how it is related to the president. So I think we need to approach that carefully.

[Park Won-seok]
It's not a matter to be cautious about. The investigative agency is demanding attendance on charges of rebellion, and the warrants of accomplices on charges of rebellion are indicated. I'm investigating it because I believe it's a rebellion. Therefore, it is not legal to say that the privilege of fluoridation should be recognized, and attendance is being conducted with the privilege of fluoridation excluded, and they are not responding to it.

[Anchor]
The charge of rebellion itself does not constitute a privilege of fluoridation.

[Park Won-seok]
That's right. The charges are completely different from those of former President Park Geun Hye. I couldn't charge you with that. This is because it is a crime in which the president's privilege to remove fluoride is maintained. Therefore, he stopped prosecuting, was fired from the presidency, and then prosecuted and arrested. But now, regardless of the presidency, you can prosecute and arrest criminal charges. We are investigating the allegations there, and to talk about the privilege of fluoridation here is to say something that violates our Constitution.

[Strict Management]
Even President Yoon never talked about the privilege of fluoridation. I don't have it, but I can't be investigated right now. Because I think the mainstream is in the impeachment trial anyway. So if the impeachment trial is cited then, naturally, in every process...

[Park Won-seok]
It's claiming the privilege of fluoridation that you can't be investigated now.

[Strict Management]
But now, for example, what is the benefit of arresting President Yoon? How can I do that?

[Park Won-seok]
It's a matter for the investigative agency to judge, not for President Yoon Suk Yeol to argue.

[Anchor]
So I wanted to ask you that now, but the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit told you to attend by tomorrow morning on Christmas. But I don't think I'll do it. Lawyer Seok Dong-hyun clearly said that tomorrow will be difficult, and he refuses to comply with the summons until the second round, so what will be the steps after that?

[Strict Management]
I think we could issue a third summons notice. Since I am an incumbent president, I think it is necessary to consult with the president on the method of investigation once the investigation into former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun is conducted to some extent. What are you going to do by summoning them for questioning? If he is not arrested and prosecuted, he has to return to his home and summon him again, which is a very complicated problem. So I think this issue needs to be approached more carefully.

[Park Won-seok]
But isn't this a serious crime? I believe that the seriousness of the crime alone is sufficient for the reason for arrest. All the workers on the main mission of the civil war, which is already an accessory, have been arrested. The arrest warrants for the main mission workers of the rebellion are all marked as the head of the rebellion. In this situation, if I continue to refuse to comply with the summons, I have no choice but to initiate a compulsory investigation process and go to the stage of an arrest warrant or arrest warrant. Refusing to comply means that we will not even recognize the warrantism of our Constitution and law, so from then on, I think it creates another reason for impeachment that rejects the rule of law at all. When the investigation resumed on December 12 and May 18, 1995, former President Roh Tae-woo was arrested by himself. However, Chun Doo-hwan continued to refuse to comply with the investigation, read the alley statement, went down to Hapcheon, his hometown, and was arrested and came up. President Yoon's appearance is similar to that of Chun Doo-hwan at the time. If you want to catch it as a result, catch it. I think the investigative agency should not give in to such a refusal to comply with the investigation when I sit in a sit-in in my official residence out of fear that I could be arrested right away if I appear now. And I don't think this is a matter of discussing the investigation process. What kind of investigation do you discuss with an insurrectionist?

[Anchor]
In any case, the documents sent by the investigative agency. and documents related to the Constitutional Court. All of them have not been received, so as you said earlier, the Constitutional Court considers them to have received them and is proceeding with the process, but this happened. College students wrote their own cards and handwritten letters and sent them to the president's office. I'll send it to the official residence. But they said they received it themselves. You'll see it in the picture, but college students used the cover like this. I'm going to draw a heart, too. I wrote a handwritten letter. I sent it to have a happy end of the year, and I received this. Do you have any other pictures? This was sent by mail, but instead, a colleague from the company received it and delivered it. So how do I interpret this?

[Strict Management]
It's true that it's a bit embarrassing for the public. However, I think we need to admit that President Yoon is not ready yet as he proceeds with the impeachment trial. So, in the past, President Park Geun Hye passed the impeachment bill at the National Assembly after more than two months of candlelight vigils. This time, there are aspects that were passed suddenly in two weeks, and the president's side is not ready, and I think I should fully understand that. And when the investigation and the impeachment trial are taking place at the same time, I think the impeachment trial is a little higher concept. Therefore, the president has no choice but to respond in such a way. I want to tell you this. Also, as the president said earlier, about 20% of the supporters, aren't these people sending wreaths and various supporting hands? Such a realistic...
that we have no choice but to rely on for things like this.
[Anchor]
That photo has a lot of hearts on the outer bag. I told them to have a good end of the year, but the content is like that. There are a lot of messages that President Yoon Suk Yeol doesn't want to see.

[Park Won-seok]
I think it's the tradition and humor of our young college students, and the duality and hypocrisy of the president of Yoon Suk Yeol were revealed through that. In the end, you will selectively see only what you want to see and receive only what you want to receive. He has lived as a prosecutor all his life, made a living by law, built a professional career by law, and emphasized the rule of law whenever he opened his mouth. It is so embarrassing and cowardly to see him reject the rule of law. In a way, the fact that such a person was the president of a country is a disgrace to the people.

[Anchor]
I see. This time, let's move the focus to acting President Han Deok-soo. The Democratic Party of Korea sent an ultimatum to Acting President Han Deok-soo, pressuring the independent counsel law and promulgating the first lady law, but the government did not present them to the Cabinet meeting agenda today. There was quite a strong opposition. Let's hear the related remarks one by one.

[Han Deok-soo / Acting President: The ruling and opposition parties must put their heads together to wisely deal with pending issues that conflict legal interpretation and political views, such as the handling of the independent counsel law or the appointment of a Constitutional Court judge. I think the ruling and opposition parties should start by discussing and negotiating compromises on how the majority of the people will understand that the special prosecution's promotion and appointment were carried out without any inclination in accordance with the Constitution and laws. If the ruling and opposition parties do not make efforts to create a legal framework that both the investigator and the receiver can accept is fair, there is a high risk of growing distrust and hatred in the Republic of Korea. ]

[Park Chan-dae / Minjoo Party floor leader: Prime Minister Han Deok-soo made it clear today (24th) that he will not promulgate the independent counsel law at a Cabinet meeting. How can a rebellion investigation be a subject of compromise when the ruling and opposition parties say they should start by discussing and negotiating compromises over the promotion and appointment of special prosecutors? There is no other way to interpret Prime Minister Han Deok-soo's words other than to delay time and continue the civil war. Both issues have been passed on to the president and the government after the discussion and decision stage of the National Assembly. The National Assembly did the work of the National Assembly, and it's the president and the government's turn to do their job, and it's an unconvincing argument to turn this back to the previous stage. It can only be interpreted to mean that you do not intend to avoid responsibility or work. ]

[Anchor]
During the focus night, I had a lot of experts and predicted what the acting Han Deok-soo's choice would be like today, but in the end, I handed over the special prosecution law back to the National Assembly. The ruling and opposition parties asked us to put our heads together and find a compromise. How did you judge today?

[Strict Management]
I believe that acting Han Deok-soo exercised his veto from a principled standpoint. But in fact, Han Deok-soo has been the prime minister since the beginning of this administration, hasn't he? So, it is the continuation of the Yoon Suk Yeol government until the conclusion of the impeachment trial of President Yoon is reached. I have no choice but to look at it like that. However, in the National Assembly, for example, the two special prosecutors, the special prosecutor for civil war plus the special prosecutor Kim Gun-hee. I interpret this as a request to discuss the issue of the two special prosecutors and the appointment of three constitutional judges at the ruling-opposition-government consultative body to be held on the 26th, and to reach an agreement. But isn't acting Han Deok-soo in a position where he has no choice but to do that? Is there any other way?

[Anchor]
Representative Park.

[Park Won-seok]
The position of acting Han Deok-soo is not important. In any case, I think it should be done according to the principle, but there are only two choices left, whether to veto or accept it after passing the parliamentary process, so you can veto it without having to issue such a message. I think he crossed the line and talked too much about it. Since the acting president is not an elected president, he has no democratic legitimacy to exercise the powers that the president exercises. It is a passive and limited exercise of authority, which is equivalent to maintaining the status quo, and it is not allowed to actively exercise such authority as veto power. The veto power on six bills including the Grain Act was passed because it was a policy issue, but this time, it is not something that can be done from the position of acting president to veto the Insurrection Special Prosecutor Act or the Special Prosecutor Kim Gun-hee Act again, according to the interpretation of the Constitution. That's what I think. However, the Constitutional Court judges have already agreed on this matter in the National Assembly. So I recommended two for the opposition party and one for the ruling party. But now that there is a civil war and impeachment after that, the ruling party is boycotting the hearing, which is ridiculous to ask the National Assembly to agree on it again. In my view, I will remain prime minister of the government of Yoon Suk Yeol. He seems to have made this decision, but if he doesn't accept it after the constitutional court candidates' approval for appointment has been processed by the 26th, I think he should impeach him right away.

[Anchor]
There are only two days left on the 26th.

[Park Won-seok]
In principle, I don't think Prime Minister Han Deok-soo should have served as acting president. He was responsible for the unconstitutional emergency and illegal emergency and attended a Cabinet meeting justifying it, so he should have either impeached him or let him resign in the first place, but I think the Democratic Party faced this situation today while trying to be loose with the National Security Council while watching public opinion. Even now, even the appointment of candidates for constitutional judges, who are only procedural appointments as acting presidents, is recommended by the National Assembly, but if they don't, they should be impeached immediately.

[Anchor]
Now, Chief Eom Kyung-young is saying that acting Han Deok-soo is a continuation of the Yoon Suk Yeol government. He should have continued to maintain that stance. Former lawmaker Park should have impeached him earlier, now Prime Minister Han Deok-soo.

[Park Won-seok]
Because the cabinet of the president impeached for civil war has no legitimacy. Furthermore, Prime Minister Han Deok-soo is the one who presided over the Cabinet meeting to attend the Cabinet meeting to justify the civil war. Therefore, I don't think it made sense to leave him as it is and take him to the acting system from the beginning.

[Anchor]
Anyway, the Democratic Party said it would wait until the 26th, and the Democratic Party. Go ahead.

[Strict Management]
So I'd like to point out some of the problems that Representative Park just said. First of all, you said that the exercise of Han Deok-soo's authority as a constitutional interpretation has a problem in the constitutional interpretation, but I think it is a wrong interpretation. Because acting Han Deok-soo was a person who proposed vetoing the Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor Act and the Special Prosecutor Act even before President Yoon was impeached in the past. while he was in charge of the Cabinet meeting But suddenly, you can't change your position just because you became an acting authority. And in fact, with the inauguration of acting Han Deok-soo, U.S. President Biden and Japan's Prime Minister Kishida fully support it. It gave me a stable signal. But how much has the economy, politics, and so on been shaking since the emergency martial law crisis? If you impeach acting Han Deok-soo again in such a situation, where on earth does the future of the Republic of Korea go? I think the Democratic Party is such a partisan group that doesn't think about national interests at all.

[Anchor]
First of all, there is an order of acting president. Therefore, Prime Minister Han Deok-soo is acting as an acting president, and if he is impeached, Deputy Prime Minister for Economy Choi Sang-mok and Deputy Prime Minister for Social Affairs Lee Ju-ho are next, but as you said, some are very concerned about the social impact, international trust, and Korea's economy.

[Park Won-seok]
What kind of civil war do people who have such concerns cause, declare unconstitutional, unconstitutional and illegal martial law and make this mess? In my opinion, it's like a red card. Uncertainty is a problem right now, but in terms of economy, diplomacy, and national interest. In the end, the biggest uncertainty is that Yoon Suk Yeol's presidential system, which causes civil war and is still in the presidency and still refuses to investigate, continues. In order to resolve this quickly, the impeachment trial must proceed quickly and a decision must be made, and for that to happen, the Constitutional Court must have a system of nine people, not six. I think obstructing the integrity of this Constitution itself is a sufficient reason for impeachment. I think it could be a violation of the Constitution and the law. Prime Minister Han Deok-soo does not have the authority to do so. Once again, the Constitution does not stipulate that the acting president cannot exercise his or her powers such as veto power, but such interpretations dominate the interpretation. And even the candidates for constitutional judges recommended by the People's Power are saying that it is right for the acting president to appoint a constitutional judge. He is using only the power of the people.

[Strict Management]
I agree with that point. The fundamental reason for the lack of three constitutional judges is the Democratic Party. This is because my term expired on October 17th. But didn't the Democratic Party of Korea come to this point while taking a passive attitude toward the recruitment of three constitutional judges for bulletproof purposes? Was the Democratic Party good then and wrong now? It's a double fire inside...

[Park Won-seok]
It's been resolved. You recommended two people. Then we can appoint him.

[Strict Management]
I mean, after dragging it for two months...

[Park Won-seok]
Didn't the ruling and opposition parties agree and recommend it? That's a previous story. You don't have to turn the conversation around.

[Strict Management]
No, I'm telling you because the Democratic Party of Korea hasn't filled in for two months, but now it's suddenly asking me to do it.

[Anchor]
It's Christmas Eve today. Please lower your tone a little bit. Anyway, let me ask you this, Senator Park. However, the legal deadline for requesting reconsideration regarding the Special Prosecutor Act is January 1st. So, why do you think the Democratic Party of Korea told you to do it until this day when Prime Minister Han Deok-soo has a week left to consider?

[Park Won-seok]
Anyway, doesn't it include the Insurrection Special Prosecutor Act? Now, the prosecution, the Senior Civil Servant Corruption Investigations Unit, and the police are investigating the civil war, but if the prosecution indicts them and then the prosecution has the right to indict them. When the special prosecutor starts working, he can't directly investigate President Yoon. The special prosecutor cannot investigate the case under the Special Prosecutor Act. Then, only the surrounding investigation will be conducted by the special prosecutor. Then, in the end, in the hands of the prosecution, in a way, the charges and prosecution of President Yoon Suk Yeol will be left to the prosecution, and is that right? In that sense, the independent counsel law must be passed quickly in order for the independent counsel to begin its work as soon as possible. The deadline is January 1st. However, I understand that he is not in a position to impeach acting Han Deok-soo for not passing the independent counsel law. Therefore, even though the motion for the appointment of three constitutional judges was passed by the National Assembly on the 26th, it is a reason for impeachment. As far as I know, the Democratic Party made this judgment.

[Anchor]
Floor leader Kwon Sung-dong talks like this. It is in a hurry to cover up the judicial risk of representative Lee Jae-myung. How about this?

[Park Won-seok]
Will it be covered? It's a week apart. I don't know when CEO Lee Jae-myung's trial will be scheduled, but if you say you're in a hurry to postpone it, you might say that. Can it be covered by saying that you're not scheduled for trial yet and you're pulling it a week earlier? I think it's useless.

[Strict Management]
I think that the ruling and opposition parties need to fully talk about that point. Because if you look at what the Democratic Party is doing now, the occupying forces are doing it like they're wiping out the remnants. So, instead of doing so, for example, there are enough ways to appoint three constitutional judges and remove toxic clauses for the special prosecutor for rebellion or the special prosecutor for Kim Gun-hee and promote it by agreement between the ruling and opposition parties. It happens to be Christmas and the holidays, so why can't we have such a conversation? The Democratic Party of Korea is now in a very advantageous position, so I hope it will try big politics. I think so.

[Anchor]
In any case, the ruling-opposition party-government consultative body will be held on the 26th, and the acting Han Deok-soo, National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-sik, and all the representatives of the ruling and opposition parties will come out, so I am curious about the situation on the 26th because the ruling-opposition party-government consultative body and the constitutional judge should be appointed on the same day. Today, he was appointed as a five-term lawmaker Kwon Young-se as the chairman of the People's Power Emergency Committee. It's been a while since former CEO Han Dong-hoon resigned. Let's hear Kwon Young-se's remarks.

[Kwon Young-se / Nominee for the People's Power Emergency Committee: In fact, reform cannot take place without the party's stability. The most important part is the unity of the party, but the party is not united, so how can we change the party when the party is not stable? (Will the composition of the emergency committee continue to be like that? For example, even close acquaintances are hired.Or.... ) I have to think about it. Yes, let's think about it. Since you were nominated today, do you agree that you are a member of the early presidential election preparation committee? ) I'm not thinking about that. ]

[Anchor]
At one point, it was discussed that Kwon Sung-dong, the floor leader, would also serve as the chairman of the emergency committee as a one-top. Anyway, Kwon Young-se, a five-term lawmaker of pro-Yoon, was appointed from the floor as the emergency committee chairman. How did you like it?

[Strict Management]
I think that the power of the people has chosen a path that is destined. This is because it is an appointment of the emergency committee, which weighs on stability rather than reform and dismissal rather than impeachment citations. However, Kwon Young-se, chairman of the emergency committee, is expected to focus on party stability, support for President Yoon's impeachment trial, and state administration through party-government consultations rather than party reform, future, and possible early presidential election preparations. However, some of the concerns about the party's reform and future parts remain.

[Anchor]
Both of you are Kwon... floor leader Kwon Sung-dong said today. Did Kwon Young-se, chairman of the emergency committee, say that squares should be drawn in a circle? Therefore, he took over as chairman of the emergency committee in a situation where reform and stability were required in a fairly complex situation. That's what they say, but I think the homework is quite heavy.

[Park Won-seok]
Well, I don't know if renovation is ridiculous and will it be stable? It can be stability in the minds of 85 lawmakers who opposed impeachment, but can it be seen as stability in the eyes of the people and in the eyes of the past who have supported the power of the people, but now have left their minds? It turns around and turns around, it becomes pro-Yoon again, it becomes the anti-impeachment party again, it becomes the coalition party, and it becomes the remnants of impeachment, but I don't know what that's like. And the emergency committee members will probably be appointed soon. Regardless of who the emergency committee members are, what newness can there be in the situation where the emergency committee chairman and the floor leader are pro-Yoon floor leader and pro-Yoon emergency committee chairman who opposed impeachment? What is the point of an apology that is already late and opposing impeachment when the emergency committee chairman says he will officially apologize to the public when he starts working? It's like crocodile tears. I don't have any expectations. I don't know, because the power of the people has chosen this system on their own, they will have to take political responsibility accordingly, but in the end, I will not separate it from the president of Yoon Suk Yeol. I think he expressed his will not to separate the power of the people from the president of Yoon Suk Yeol. Then can you do anything about it? The people have no choice but to separate the power of the people.

[Anchor]
Lastly, how do you see the composition of the emergency committee afterwards?

[Strict Management]
I similarly acknowledge Kwon Young-se's emergency committee. In fact, it is a leadership system with President Yoon as the center, and that's what I think. So, whether or not to include the Handong discipline is controversial. In fact, there are not many people in the party who can say Handong Hoongye. And I don't know when the impeachment trial will come out, but isn't it expected to be around March or April? Until then, confusion is inevitable, and there is no choice but to support the impeachment trial against President Yoon. have that limitation I admit it like this.

[Anchor]
Focus Night Tuesday is the hottest day of the week. Today was no exception. Tomorrow is Christmas. Shall we shout "Merry Christmas" and say bye to each other? We'll end Focus Night. Thank you.