[Start briefing] Gangnam Dermatology is overflowing... "It's Botox but I don't watch atopy".

On Tuesday, November 5, the start briefing will begin.

First, the Dong-A Ilbo.

At this time yesterday, we dealt with 'unpaid treatment' prevalent in medical institutions. Today, we will talk about Gangnam, Seoul. Dermatology is overflowing, but there are many places where Botox is available and atopic treatment is not available. Let's go to Apgujeong, Gangnam. It's a place full of dermatology and plastic surgery signs. However, the reality is that it is difficult to find a dermatologist who actually treats skin diseases. Only one-third of the dermatologists in Gangnam-gu have specialists. The other two-thirds are where there are no dermatologists. And 80% of these two-thirds do not treat skin diseases. Most of them are places where non-payment treatment is provided, such as Botox and laser procedures. As a result, parents also share dermatology that treats children with skin diseases. Plastic surgery is also poverty in abundance. Only about 20% of Gangnam plastic surgery clinics can undergo reconstructive surgery. However, it is difficult to view this as a refusal of treatment legally. As doctors flock to non-payment treatment for cosmetic purposes that can make a lot of money, there are fewer places for sick patients to go.

The next Hankyoreh newspaper.

This time, let's move the neighborhood a little to the side. It is Daechi-dong, Gangnam-gu, the 1st private education center in Korea. 1,800 people flocked to the entrance examination for an elementary school math academy, which selects 330 students. It was a scene where even parents said they would transfer if they failed, so go away from college. The entrance exam for this academy is called the 'Bull exam' after the academy. It is so popular that the academy server goes down on the test reception date. One parent said that the advantage of this place is to develop students' "hip strength" because they don't send them home until they solve all the problems. There is also an auxiliary academy that prepares for the entrance examination of this academy for a year. On social media, there is already a roadmap for elementary education in Daechi-dong. These are the 'four-year-old examination' to send to a good English kindergarten, the 'seven-year-old examination' to enter an English academy, and the bull exam. As the school-age population decreased, it became an era of private education from the age of kindergarten. The road map for private education in Daechi-dong spreads to other regions such as Jamsil and Bundang. It is analyzed that the fear marketing of the private education market also makes the private education ecosystem tighter. Experts point out that the risk level is a system that makes both those who do and don't do good deeds tremble with anxiety. Some say that private education will change only when competitive Korean society itself changes.

Here's a Seoul newspaper article.

It dealt with the apartment 'resident parking ticket' subject to used transactions. It is said that trick transactions are increasing to buy and sell parking tickets at the carrot market next door. The more cars registered, the more proportional the parking fee is. That's why a house with a lot of cars is trying to buy a parking ticket for residents in the next complex. It is said that it is usually traded at around 100,000 won to 200,000 won per month. Buyers reduce parking costs, and sellers earn pocket money. What is the reason why parking tickets are constantly being traded? It's probably because the number of registered cars is increasing every year. In terms of the number of cars per population, the metropolitan area has 2.26 people and the non-metropolitan area has one car per 1.73. However, the legal profession believes that selling apartment parking tickets without residents' consent will result in civil liability. There is also a possibility of criminal punishment for obstruction of business. There may be violations of the Apartment Housing Management Act, so you should be careful.

This is the last Chosun Ilbo.

A teacher accused of child abuse for pulling a wrist has been cleared of charges in five years. The Supreme Court reversed and returned it to the effect of innocence. Let's look back on time to see what happened at an elementary school in Gyeonggi-do. Teacher A pulled the wrist of a student who insisted that he would not participate in the class and not go to the cafeteria. However, the child did not move, and Mr. A moved to the cafeteria with the rest of the students with the parents' consent. But right after lunch, my parents came. A was sued by the police on charges of child abuse, saying he hurt his wrist by pulling the child and throwing him to the floor. The police induced him, saying, "Isn't it right to hurt the child?" and the prosecution summarily prosecuted him for physical abuse. The first and second trials found that the throwing was not guilty, but that it was abuse that dragged and injured the wrist. However, the Supreme Court determined that there was no intention of causing physical pain. I saw it as a guiding act to encourage participation in education. In this way, A has been cleared of charges in five years.In addition to Mr.
A, there are many teachers who are accused of abuse while teaching students. There are also rulings that respect the professionalism and teaching rights of teachers.

I looked at the newspaper on the morning of November 5th.

This has been the start briefing.