Hong Joon Pyo and Han Dong-hoon shot again. Inspection for self-criticism? "It's something to do." [Y transcript]

■ Host: Lee Ha-rin Anchor
■ Starring: Choi Chang-ryul, Yongin University Special Professor, Park Sang-gyu, current affairs critic

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN Newswide] when quoting.

◇Anchor> Former Senior Administrator of the Presidential Office Kim Dae-nam's phone call with an Internet media reporter ahead of the July 23 national convention continues to be controversial. He is suspected of instigating an attack on Han, saying that if he attacked Han Dong-hoon, Kim would like it. The presidential office denies the connection, saying it is not close to former administrator Kim. Representative Han Dong-hoon said that a fact-finding investigation is needed even more as it has nothing to do with the president. Do you think we need a fact-finding mission?

◆Park Sang-gyu> To start with the conclusion, a fact-finding investigation is necessary. However, they have different opinions on the format that CEO Han Dong-hoon says. So let's get to the bottom of it, but the party leader is attacking him. You're the target of the owner's attack. It's a form of openly ordering a fact-finding investigation with your own. By doing so, isn't this becoming an issue that the Democratic Party will relatively like politically?

So, it is true that this is an individual deviation from the presidential office in Yongsan. Kim Dae-nam also has a strong side of showing off his friendship with the president and his wife. I don't know the truth. However, they are saying that we need to consider this carefully, but CEO Han Dong-hoon and his aides keep saying that this is structural, and it's not just one case. It's behind it, and it's seen as a female-female conflict because you keep raising problems like this, but if you look at representative Han Dong-hoon's argument, it's kind of in line with the Democratic Party's argument.

And if you look at the attack of Daegu Mayor Hong Joon Pyo, you don't agree with the expression that it's a little bit like that with personal problems.Ma is a bit raw. Rep. Na Kyung-won also said, "Who will be good at this?" and said, "Isn't the essence of this problem shifting to conflict between women and women?" This is how I see it.

Formally, I think it's time to talk about the results with a reasonable fact after being more secretive and private. Also, above all, former senior administrator Kim Dae-nam is not giving up the position after receiving a billion-dollar salary for SGI guarantee insurance. I don't understand this. We need to clean up our election records first. They tell me to organize it myself, but I can't organize it myself in these matters.

◇Anchor> The president's office said to clean up on your own.

◆Park Sang-gyu> He says he won't step down. Speaking of honey jar, I don't know.

◇Anchor> He pointed out that it should have been conducted more secretly and privately. Professor, what do you think?

◆Choi Chang-ryul> I don't think that's the essence of such a problem. I think it's a criticism of why CEO Han Dong-hoon is so angry when it's an attack on him.

◇ Anchor> Hong Joon Pyo Hong Joon-pyo is a bit like a baby, and the ruling party leader is criticizing him. Rep. Na Kyung-won said it was the act.

◆Choi Chang-ryul> I don't think I'm going to criticize like that. It could be a matter of how CEO Han Dong-hoon works. If an argument is revealed after investigating it later, we can talk about it then. If CEO Han Dong-hoon thought there was a real problem with this, he thinks he can order a fact-finding investigation.

I think lawmakers Na Kyung-won and these people criticize Han Dong-hoon too strongly. This is also the logic of the camp within the ruling party, and the cracks in the ruling party are... I think it's almost a collision to the point where the word crack doesn't even fit. I think that's what happens.

If representative Han Dong-hoon's relationship with the president is not rough, I think he would come out without pointing out like this, but so would Representative Na Kyung-won. So I don't understand this behavior of former senior administrator Kim Dae-nam. Is it a personal matter? According to Kim Dae-nam, the former administrator, what kind of friendship he had with the president, there is a saying that he met with Yoon when he was elected.

But the president's office says they don't know. So we don't know who's right about this. In addition, former administrator Kim Dae-nam denies it.Ma said something similar like, "Ma took a picture and went." That's not true, they say they've never had an influence.

◇Anchor> An acquaintance of Seoul Guarantee Insurance recommended it and claims that he applied.

◆Choi Chang-ryul> It's like a trophy for the ruling party, the opposition party, and the previous government. That's something that really needs fixing, but who said they're going to get rid of the parachute? The president was like that in the past, and the president is like that now. I made a promise like that, but it's not an empty story. People who have been in the presidential office in the past or now, or who have been in the Blue House in the past, are waiting in line for such a position.

An acquaintance recommended those parts through such a normal procedure? In my view, it's common sense to see who influenced it. That part must also be revealed. As we said earlier, our critic Park Sang-gyu said something good, so we should quit. It's causing such a stir. It's common sense to think that he went here because of the influence of the ruling party and the ruling party, he denies it.Ma. You have to give up this seat.

If the presidential office puts pressure on this incorrectly, it's called abuse of authority. You have to decide your own course of action, but the passport has to influence somehow. Isn't that how it's supposed to be? In the case of ministerial candidates, if it becomes a problem, they quit themselves. But what kind of influence does it all work in it? Shouldn't we do it like this? But does it make sense that you're still here?

◇Anchor> Quitting will end this controversy?

◆Choi Chang-ryul> It's not over for now, but we have to decide on our future and let him quit.

Excerpted from
: Lee Sun Digital News Team Editor

#YRecord