"Special Prosecutor" veto... "No Leave Votes," "Interrupting Investigation."

[Anchor]
As President Yoon Suk Yeol exercised his right to demand reconsideration, or veto, on three bills, including the Kim Gun-hee Special Prosecutor Act, tension is also rising in the ruling and opposition parties.

The ruling party was confident that there would be no vote to leave the re-vote, saying it was unconstitutional and illegal, and the opposition party set the day that there was no reason to refuse if it had not committed a crime.

I'm connecting with the reporter. Reporter Jeong Inyong!

[Reporter]
Yes, it's the National Assembly.

[Anchor]
President Yoon approved his veto today, and the ruling and opposition parties are likely to have mixed reactions,
Has the official reaction
been reached?

[Reporter]
Yes, the ruling and opposition parties have not yet made an official position because the right to request reconsideration has been approved a little while ago.

However, since these were expected to be vetoed, both the ruling and opposition parties have maintained a clear position,

The ruling party believes that pursuing the independent counsel law is intended to eventually divide the ruling party internally.

In particular, he criticizes the opposition's special prosecution as a link to the impeachment of the president.

The party is confident that this time, like the bills that the ruling party has previously opposed, it will be rejected without a vote of departure.

On the other hand, the opposition party is setting up a day of criticism over the veto with Yoon's past remarks that he is refusing the independent counsel because he is guilty.

He says he appears to be guilty of his own guilt, otherwise there is no reason to refuse.

He also argued that if President Yoon values fairness, he should not interfere with the investigation of First Lady Kim, and that he should be punished the same as others suspected of manipulating stock prices.

It is expected that a re-vote will take place at the plenary session on the 4th, and attention is being paid to whether the ruling party will unite as a single party and abolish the bill.

[Anchor]
The ruling party seems to have a growing impact on the phone recording of a person from the presidential office.

Please tell us what it's about with your party's reaction.

[Reporter]
Yes, Kim Dae-nam, a former senior administrator in the presidential office, has been controversial over the past phone call with a pro-night media reporter,
During the last People's Power National Convention, Kim Gun-hee's remarks were made public that Kim Gun-hee would like it if he attacked then-party candidate Han Dong-hoon.

The auditor Kim said that the media that released the remarks are alienating the ruling party and the president's office, but there is considerable opposition from the close circle within the ruling party.

Rep. Chin-gye said in a phone call with YTN that it is necessary to find out the authenticity of the remarks at the time, and pointed out that it is necessary to examine whether it is his or her idea or whether it is behind it.

Another close ally said, "It is an act that tarnishes the honor and name of the party," stressing that the investigation should be conducted thoroughly.

On the other hand, Rep. Yun-gye, weighing the possibility that the remarks were made by a person inflating his relationship with the president, predicted that the impact would not be significant.

I don't actually know President Yoon or First Lady Kim Gun-hee, but I could have exaggerated it just because I was from the presidential office.

In the meantime, President Yoon is having a dinner with the ruling party's floor leadership, the standing committee chairman, and the secretary of the standing committee today, and there are many interpretations about the absence of representative Han Dong-hoon.

A key floor official was wary of the expanded interpretation that it was an encouragement to prepare well for the October parliamentary audit, but
In the pro-limit of
, it is not fair to discuss the situation of the National Assembly without Han, saying that it is the party leader's position to oversee the floor and the outside.

[Anchor]
Park Sang-yong's impeachment hearing is also being held at the National Assembly today.

What is it about?

[Reporter]
Yes, the prosecutor Park Sang-yong's impeachment inquiry hearing is being held from 10 a.m. today.

This is the second prosecutor impeachment hearing following the hearing of Deputy Prosecutor Kim Young-chul in August.

The opposition party believes that prosecutor Park cajoled false statements against former Gyeonggi-do Province Deputy Governor for Peace Lee Hwa-young in the process of investigating the illegal remittance to North Korea,

Especially as former Lieutenant Governor Lee Hwa-young is coming out today, we are also paying keen attention to the possibility of a meaningful statement.

However, there is a lot of concern that the remaining key witnesses, including prosecutor Park, will not be present and it will be a fierce hearing.

The ruling party is determined to actively reveal the injustice of the impeachment prosecution through this hearing.

It is expected to emphasize that the former lieutenant governor Lee was sentenced to heavy punishment in the first trial, and that the former lieutenant governor Lee's claim was not accepted by the court.

Rather, we plan to counterattack that it is a case of obstruction of justice and that it is a procedure for representative Lee Jae-myung's bulletproof.

This is YTN Jeong Yong-yong in the National Assembly so far.