Jang Ye-chan, "Han Dong-hoon, a sudden change in criticism of 野 instead of 'Yongsan'? "I was caught in the party bulletin board".

Jang Ye-chan)

- Han Dong-hoon feels something as he shows 'self-destruction' and 'beop-kkkurae' in the conservative camp. It's considered

- Han Dong-hoon, get hit quickly anyway.Come back to the old 'Chado Nam' Han Dong-hoon instead of 'Bukkurae'

- Han Dong-hoon, rather "Family did it." Kneel and pray

- 尹 attack post, as soon as it is posted on the party's bulletin board, it is reported in the media..the possibility of being organized

[News FM Lee Ik-seon Choi Soo-young Issue & People]

□ Broadcast date and time: November 21, 2024 (Thursday)
□ Host: Lee Ik-seon, Choi Soo-young
□ Performers: Jang Ye-chan, Supreme Council member of the Power of the People Youth, Kim Sung-wan, current affairs critic

- After Han Dong-hoon's 尹 statement, did he turn to criticism of 野 instead of Yongsan? You're getting a weakness in "Tangerine"?
- Why can't 韓 sue 'family Druking' suspicions like 'Cheongdam-dong drinking party'

Kim Sung-wan)
- The 'tanger controversy' in South Korea reminds me of the 'Hyegyeonggung Kim' in the past.Negative on South Korea's presidential prices

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

◇ Interest Line: We are with two people who analyze the twisted political issues in a fun and easy-to-understand manner. Top three this week. Critic Kim Sung-wan, a poetry reading critic, and Jang Ye-chan, a former member of the Supreme Council of the Power of the People, are here. Welcome. Let's start with the first keyword. Yes, this week's top three. The first keyword is 'self-destruction'.

◆Choi Soo-young: The controversy over slanderous messages on the bulletin board of the People's Power Party does not seem to disappear easily. There was controversy over hundreds of slanderous articles about President Yoon and his family on the bulletin board, but a representative who had remained silent finally opened his mouth, saying, "If it's not an illegal matter, it's not appropriate to explain it thoroughly. It's not something to fall into unnecessary self-destruction."

■Jang Ye-chan: This cowardly excuse, continued silence by CEO Han Dong-hoon is causing the power of the people and self-destruction within the conservative camp. This part is not just an opinion, but today's Chosun Ilbo and Dong-A Ilbo editorials urge CEO Han Dong-hoon to reveal the allegations of family involvement himself. So, this is not something that requires a grand investigation, but you can communicate the family's position that ends when you go home and ask your family. But the fact that he's not even doing it seems to me as a de facto confession. At the same time, the use of the word "illegal issue" is not that Han Dong-hoon is not a politician yet, but has a prosecutor-style mind. This is the so-called 'beop loach' look. I can't say my family didn't do it, but can I get a search warrant to find out? I don't think obstruction of business or defamation is enough to get a search warrant? Then let's crush it. But this can be the mind of a prosecutor, a mind of a legal professional, a mind of a lawyer defending a criminal, but it cannot be the position of a politician leading a public party. That's why the more people show this kind of shape, the more they are stabbed. It seems that the real family did it, so there seems to be no choice but to have this confirmation as time goes by.

◇Lee Ik-seon: Rep. Kang Myung-koo, a pro-Yoon-gye lawmaker, said, "If we don't want to fall into the self-destruction column, we have to solve it and go," adding, "Han should solve it himself." I put pressure on him.

□Kim Sung-wan: That's so obvious. The Dong-A Ilbo and the Chosun Ilbo wrote the same editorial today. The Hankyoreh Kyunghyang Shinmun, which is said to be progressive, also pointed out this part in an editorial. So, I don't understand in common sense why you're dragging a fight that doesn't have to be complicated and difficult. For example, it's said that you wrote it under your own name. There are eight people who are registered under the name of Han Dong-hoon, but I'm not. Among them, you explained like this. Then your family is also being mentioned by name. It's not my family. If you do it like this, it's okay, but I don't know why I can't reveal this. Rather, if you express the voice that tells you to reveal this part as self-destruction, you are saying that self-destruction is a matter of internal conflict within the party. Then you can solve it with politics. Why do you keep taking what the party can solve to the question of whether it is illegal or not? Let's just think that this problem happened in the Democratic Party, which is very strange. What would CEO Han Dong-hoon have attacked? I wouldn't have told you to investigate quickly. But if there is a problem with the passport, the prosecution or the police believe that we will never be able to investigate or that we will not be able to search and seizure servers. But actually, this continues to be controversial even among the people. If there is a text message from the Democratic Party of Korea or representative Lee Jae-myung, the server is raided and the Democratic Party of Korea is also raided. Even though the lawmakers blocked it with their bodies, the ruling party is not doing anything. I'd like to tell you to investigate because the police were quickly accused.

◆Choi Soo-young: But isn't the first person to raise this issue the best?

■Jang Ye-chan: It's not the first time, but rather through the established media. It's a problem that more supporters raised much earlier.

◆Choi Soo-young: So I've been continuously dragging this problem, but there's a story like this. In the closeness community, Jang said this is "Han Dong-hoon's family Druking." No, this is a critical opinion about the president and his wife on a bulletin board only viewed by party members, but they refute again, saying, "What kind of Druking is this?"

■Jang Ye-chan: What matters is whether or not public opinion is manipulated. Even if it's a party bulletin board, for example, if representative Han Dong-hoon's family, such as lawyer Jin Eun-jung, posted several posts at the same time under the ID of another family member, this is what Druking did. There is simply a difference between whether you used the machine or not. However, I looked for all the Supreme Court precedents in the Druking case and former Governor Kim Kyung-soo's case. I don't blame you for not using a machine or not. If you operate more with a machine, you will be punished more severely. If you steal it in someone else's name and express your opinion on it, it's all guilty of obstruction of business. So, just because this is not a machine and the target is a party bulletin board, there is no difference from the logic of guilty punishment in the Druking case, and I recently released some evidence, but this does not end with the party bulletin board. The same content posted by family members on the party's bulletin board is also posted on the portal. And the account that Han Dong-hoon worked out with the same IP was captured by us. And I even released all the capture materials, so there's no objection from the close circle about that. So, this is not any political debate or a conflict between pro-Yoon and pro-Yoon, but people like me who claim that Han Dong-hoon's family manipulated public opinion say it with evidence. We basically don't even talk about it if there's no capture. But over there, they can't refute any evidence and keep watering down, so these images rather put CEO Han Dong-hoon in a political corner. In the past, he used to be a car man, but now he's a cold city man. Why are you making excuses like this? Han Dong-hoon keeps changing his image to look a little pathetic. It's better to get hit quickly anyway.

□Kim Sung-wan: I have a question. So, at the national convention last time, when Han Dong-hoon was the Minister of Justice at the time, he raised suspicions that he ran a comment team. It looks overlapping with this one. What's hard to say is that the family has been working hard to post comments, right? According to what you just said, it's confirmed that it's actually the case. Then, isn't the party leader Han Dong-hoon running the comment team, which had been around since he was the justice minister, even after he became the party leader? Because it could mean that someone else wrote it for him after getting his family's real name certified. I'm not the only one suspicious of this, but today's Dong-A Ilbo editorial also mentioned this. Is this not a possibility? Do you know anything?

■Jang Ye-chan: I'll tell you everything I know. I didn't ask you to write a comment or post about what you asked me to do because I had evidence and only told you what I experienced. I've never said that before. I told you that it was to tell a story that was politically helpful on the show, and since I talked about it, lawmaker Yang Moon-seok and others said they suspected this, so I found a comment account, but that's not what I said. However, the reason why the pattern revealed this time is heavier both legally and politically is that it has been confirmed that hundreds of posts have been posted by one person with multiple IDs and family IDs at the same time. So, I think that suspicion can spread about this. However, what I've said in several interviews is that one of the family members has the lowest level of criticism or legal responsibility. If a family member gets certified and asks someone outside to do this, the legal and political responsibility grows infinitely. So, it's not the quickest and easiest way to kneel and pray that the family did it quickly and that it's wrong, but it's a better way for Han than for controversy to spread to the other side.

□Kim Sung-wan: But this could be a statement that breaks down the rule of law in our country. If an illegal situation is found or suspected, we should investigate it, right?

■Jang Ye-chan: Of course. So today, the representative of a civic group who just filed a complaint against CEO Han Dong-hoon's family account has begun a second investigation into the police accuser. But if you look at this, it's rare to investigate the accuser right away within a few days of filing a complaint. However, the fact that Han Dong-hoon's family account, not the account of Han Dong-hoon, was investigated in less than a week means that the police have a strong will to investigate it, so Han's representative is pushing into one logic and another like a legal crane, but it seems to be inferred that the police have a strong will to investigate based on the speed at which they are currently investigating.

◇Lee Ik-seon: But is it a problem that Han Dong-hoon's family name came up in many media about this issue? Or is it a problem to slander the president? I've seen a lot of questions about what's wrong with it.

■Jang Ye-chan: Suspicion of manipulation of public opinion that several names were stolen is the most problematic, but it is also a problem in terms of content. Some people say, "Why shouldn't we criticize the president?" but the level and expressions of the language are too poor.

◇ Profits line: But can this manipulate public opinion? What's written on the party's bulletin board?

■Jang Ye-chan: Based on in-house bulletin board posts, close speakers appeared on the broadcast and said, "Didn't you see the party? This is how the party leader Han Dong-hoon also mentioned 'the party' a lot, and the original party bulletin board doesn't get an article. However, when the contents of Han Dong-hoon's favor and attacking Yoon Suk Yeol's president come up in the stage, it becomes reported in the media. That means someone picked up a dangge and reported it to the media. It's likely to be an organized movement of the close community.

◆Choi Soo-young: There are some comments on our YouTube right now, but there are a lot of curses about Han Dong-hoon on the party's bulletin board, so why are you doing this with this?

□Kim Sung-wan: I think it will be logical if you find out if the person who wrote it is related to President Yoon Suk Yeol or someone related to pro-Yoon-gye. So for me, this controversy is similar to the controversy that CEO Lee Jae-myung had in the past when he was governor of Gyeonggi-do. I don't want to mention it again, but after the party raised suspicions that the spouse of a man called a leading presidential candidate posted a message criticizing the incumbent president, the party just split its members and the fight went on for an incredible long time. The fight is very messy, too. But what's happening in the power of the people right now. He's a leading presidential candidate and an incumbent party leader. However, since the current party leader's family is not even the party leader, if they post such a low-level criticism against the president and his wife, who are at odds with the party leader, this itself could be a very moral problem. And most of all, the party members are divided. If the party members are emotionally divided like this, representative Han Dong-hoon will run for president later. There will be a constant voice from someone who is probably against it. So, when such a problem comes out, it is necessary to quickly organize it, but representative Han can't do that. If you can't do it, you can go to such a fight. I think this is a very bad controversy. I want to ask the best question. There is one thing that is suspicious right now, but after President Yoon Suk Yeol held a press conference, representative Han Dong-hoon continued his silence. So, after that, I told you to resolve the risk of Kim Gun-hee's problem until then because it was a four-request requirement and a five-request requirement. Since then, my attitude has changed completely. Can I say it's not related to this issue?

■Jang Ye-chan: You're lying. Only CEO Han Dong-hoon himself knows, but even if the media did not report after President Yoon Suk Yeol's public statement, YouTubers who were reporters raised suspicions about this on November 5. Then CEO Han Dong-hoon would have encountered this. Since he is a good person in the online community, he suddenly appreciates the public statement and does not talk about the president, but suddenly criticizes the Democratic Party of Korea, which said he should do so. So people like Kim Kyu-wan, a famous editor at CBS, use the expression, "CEO Han Dong-hoon was caught in this incident." So, as critic Kim Sung-wan asked, I think we can reasonably doubt that the weakness of the party's bulletin board gate Druking case was behind the sudden change in the attitude of Han Dong-hoon, who has changed suddenly since early November and stopped paying attention to Yongsan.

◇ Lee Ik-seon: I see. However, Jang's best writer once said that there is a high possibility of specifying one of Han's family members as the author. Don't you change the basis and the mind you thought about then?

■Jang Ye-chan: My spouse, Jin Eun-jung, is my specific name and Druking's torso. Or you can sue me. But he can never sue me. The moment you sue me for false information about why you can't file a complaint, you have more grounds for the police to request a search and seizure warrant. So CEO Han Dong-hoon can't sue me even if I'm Druking while revealing his family name. By the way, Han Dong-hoon, who we know, is a person who won't sue because he is called Druking by touching not only himself but also his family? I'm a person who won't respond like this. Then why did you sue Cheongdam-dong's drinking party and why did you do that? That's why it doesn't add up, and the only person who can get the name of both parents and their daughter who went to the U.S. to be certified is the spouse.