Over the years, I've been on the security guard for "bugging and gabbing"..."Hell Apartments" that 10 people quit. [Y Record]

■ Host: anchor Lee Se-na, anchor Na Kyung-chul
■ Starring: lawyer Lim Joo-hye

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN New Square 2PM] when quoting.

◆ Anchor: Resident's overuse of power against security guards that are repeated when it is forgotten. We're going to watch it now. The court ruled that each resident should pay up to 20 million won per person for verbal abuse and abuse of power against apartment management workers?

◇ Lim Joo-hye: That's right. There are many meanings in the word Gapjil, and this case also seems to have shown a very heinous appearance. It has been revealed that this security guard caused a resident to suffer a lot of mental suffering, along with a very serious desecration of personality. Keep patrolling smoking areas every 10 minutes, which has already happened since 2019. In addition to asking for personal delivery to be delivered to you, the level of verbal abuse was enormous. Bark like a dog. Or bring your parents from the grave while cursing them. That's ridiculous. It has caused such extreme pain, which is why more than 10 employees left the company. You can guess how hard you've been through. In this regard, the court ruled for damages, so the total amount executed was 45 million won. The claim for alimony was recognized as 20 million won for the head of the management office, 20 million won for the employees, and 5 million won for the chairman of the resident representative who was constantly harassed to fire them. As you said, the compensation judgment for alimony claims of up to 20 million won to individuals has been recognized, but about 20 million won compared to the usual alimony amount has come out of this case. However, this behavior of this person can only be seen as continuous harassment for a long time. In addition to making this person do this kind of verbal abuse and this ridiculous work, he has also made continuous progress, complaints, and claims for damages against these victims. All of these parts were not recognized, but given the circumstances of continuous harassment, the amount of compensation claims of 20 million won has been raised unusually, but there is still a long way to go. It is difficult to say that this amount of money is enough for us to eradicate such abuse of power.

◆ Anchor: You said that the alimony was raised by 20 million won, but I think there may be some criticism that the punishment for probation is too weak.

◇ Lim Joo-hye: That's right. Of course, this situation is like a civil claim for compensation. Criminal punishment was also recognized. Assault. You can think about it. And now, the threat of retaliation. I also made a retaliatory threat that I would not let the person who stated the damage like this. Naturally, the part of the insult to such insulting remarks was also a problem, but the suspended sentence came out. He was sentenced to one year in prison and suspended for two years for assault or retaliation threats. He was also sentenced to four months in prison and suspended for one year for the insult. In the end, some say that the degree of bullying and the punishment is too soft compared to the duration of the sentence, but it seems clear that the ruling has taken a step forward. I would like to say that it is encouraging that the suspension of execution for such continuous harassment has also been confirmed to be wrong, so criminal punishment has been imposed, and that alimony claims have been recognized, which have been significantly increased compared to before.

◆ Anchor: It's on the screen right now, but it's really hard to say. When I reported the residents like this, they went to the victims and did such heinous things that they couldn't do, such as spitting in the face, and the court saw this and judged that the purpose was to harass the victims, and this is how you saw it?

◇ Lim Joo-hye: That's right. It can be evaluated that the court's comment once again emphasized and confirmed that the nature of the crime is very poor. First of all, the period of bullying and the period itself has been very long. As mentioned earlier, they have also overused lawsuits against the victims. I think this lawsuit itself was conducted for the purpose of just harassing the victims rather than saying that I would fight this part because I felt unfair. Therefore, considering the degree of assault and the period of harassment, I think it can be evaluated as a meaningful, step-by-step ruling.

Excerpted from
: Jeong Eui-jin, Editor of the Digital News Team