If I were a 尹, I would have come with Kim Geon-hee and apologized, "I'm so sorry."

[News FM Lee Ik-seon Choi Soo-young Issue & People]

□ Broadcast date and time: November 7, 2024 (Thursday)
□ Host: Lee Ik-seon, Choi Soo-young
□ Cast: Lawyer Jeon Won-chaek

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

- What did you do then, the 尹 who said that First Lady Kim's special prosecutor was unconstitutional and headed the investigation team under Special Prosecutor Park Young-soo? Lost convincing to the people
- After the 尹, an opportunity for Han Dong-hoon? The ruling party's split, most of the politics are left.

◇ Choi Soo-young: I'm not opposed to the Kim Gun-hee independent counsel law in terms of 'wife love'. However, there is an unconstitutional element and then there is a human rights violation. Is this why I effectively hinted at vetoing it because I'm against it?

■ Powerbook: How or the President has a point. If you study comparative constitutional studies. I couldn't train in graduate school, but I went to graduate school for a year and a half, and I studied comparative constitutional studies under Professor Park Yoo-kyung, but I couldn't study because it was too difficult. But if you study it, you will naturally study the impeachment system and the special prosecutor system. You will study the comparative constitution, especially in the United States, which is a presidential country, the special prosecutor system is literally seen as part of the administrative power to investigate the prosecution itself. That's why we don't understand that the National Assembly decides to use the special prosecutor as a bill. If you look at star prosecutors in the past, for example, the Minister of Justice appoints them during the special prosecution. Then President Yoon said that today. However, there is something wrong with our special prosecutor system because we do so in the United States over such institutional differences. Why is the legislature involved in the independent counsel's investigation rights? It's weird for us to listen to it like this. Then, what are you, the Yoon Suk Yeol who has been the investigation team leader at Special Prosecutor Park Young-soo so far? Then, what did you do? Then, you volunteered under the wrong system, so to be honest, the senior prosecutor became a star through the special prosecutor, and because you tried to maintain the right to prosecute, President Moon Jae In didn't order the head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office. That's why I became president. For the first time in five years. The person who went through that process suddenly said, "Our special prosecutor system is weird," so the listener is not convincing anymore. It's weird.
But from our point of view in Korea, the special prosecutor is operated like this, but just one special prosecutor, for example, is the core. You should have honestly explained whether it would be okay if the opposition party, which attacks the government from the opposition party, allowed the appointment at will. In the past, the opposition party appointed independent counsel Park Young-soo. But no, you have to appoint a special prosecutor who can be fair from a third-party standpoint. If you look at the special prosecutor bill that the opposition party keeps releasing, that's it. If only the opposition party recommends it, only the Democratic Party recommends it, and only the opposition party recommends it, so the president belongs to it. It's the same thing that the opposition appoints. Is that the special prosecutor then? It's the opposition prosecutor! So, it would have been a little convincing if the president had said that honestly, but suddenly, we went into the constitutional principle, and this is a system of special prosecutors that goes against the separation of powers. Who would honestly study the constitution?

◆ Lee Ik-seon: I'd like to ask you this. Our focus was on whether Mrs. Kim should come out and apologize in person.

■ Jeon Won-chaek: If I were the president, I would have accompanied Kim Gun-hee today. So even if I can't say hello to the people by saying hello to the folder even for 10 minutes, I'm the one who really caused a stir. It didn't help my husband and it was a doubt. I'm really sorry. As I promised during the election, I will only be faithful to the internal affairs in the future. I will go to the parts that are essential to diplomacy and the parts that I can't do without, but if I had apologized that I would really take care of the rest, the people would have changed completely. But I missed that opportunity again. It's such a shame that I missed the opportunity. If I do something. To be honest, this is everything in political science, but if you get beaten up and you get beaten up, you applaud the people upside down. If you say you're handsome and stick to the end. The people are going to point their fingers. I missed another opportunity to apologize again as to why people in power don't know such basic principles.

◇ Choi Soo-young: Let me also ask you about greetings. In fact, today's first question was about the reform of the state administration. As for personnel appointments, the president said, "I'm looking at various pools, and it's not right to put all the pictures on the front page at once. I don't know about high-level positions, but not working-level positions. Then are you saying that you don't know about high-level positions? Are you saying that you're going to replace the chief of staff Jung Shin-seok?

■ Powerbook: No, I will replace all ministers who have been around for more than two years now. Also, it appears in the media like this, but to be honest, I want to ask you one thing backwards. How many ministers the Korean people know will be now? People who always analyze politics like us and those who are related to the media know a lot. You know the prime minister's name, the major ministers, the most problematic ministers so far. Starting with the Minister of Public Administration and Security, the Minister of Justice and the Minister of Justice have changed recently, so I don't know if there are other people who don't know. Since our Minister of Economy and Finance is always at the center of our country's politics, we know the names of the Minister of Economy and Finance and the Minister of National Defense, who will be replaced by the head of the security office this time. But it's confusing when the names of the rest of the ministers go in. And because of the medical crisis, the name of the Minister of Health and Welfare is now known, and the name of the Minister of Education is also known. Actually. In fact, the prime minister system must be eliminated for Minister Lee to serve as a staff member. It shouldn't be like the United States. The United States has a vice president instead of a prime minister, so now they hold a cabinet meeting in the West Wing of the White House. I'm holding a Cabinet meeting, but there's no microphone like this. It's all attached to the chair of the State Council. If you take a picture of the president of the State Council on the second floor of the Prime Minister's Office, 10 Downing Street, England, where is the microphone? We all get close to each other, hand over documents, receive them, and talk to each other. The Prime Minister sits at the middle, then the Minister of Health and Education sits at the end with the Minister of Foreign Affairs and Finance. I can communicate all of that well. But even at a meeting with our senior aides, we talk with the microphone in front of us. And during the Cabinet meeting, this is really great. If you sit around in a circle and talk to yourself, you can't hear at the end over there. But what that means is that they are so far apart from each other, and the minister is not functioning as a presidential aide.
Then who does the presidential staff function? The secretaries of the presidential office in Yongsan do it. This is why aides are secretaries, and aides in the presidential office openly talk like this in newspapers. That's wrong. The chief aide, the chief secretary, in the presidential office is secretary Lee Gun. The secretary has to keep his mouth shut to the end. It's a secretary who only needs precious and eyes. You have to kick out anyone whose secretary is talking. Then you have to cut your neck. So secretaries should only act as secretaries, but all of our secretaries should open their mouths. Take a look at the newspaper. How often do these expressions appear, such as high-ranking officials and key officials in the presidential office in Yongsan? It appears in almost every article. That means the minister has no mouth, and secretaries in the presidential office are acting as aides to the president, not to mention senior secretaries. Then, if this is a problem this time, what has been a problem so far? Incompetent ministers and secretaries of the presidential office in Yongsan who overplayed their roles should be treated.

◆ Lee Ik-seon: When asked if he wants to resolve the conflict with CEO Han Dong-hoon first, he will work hard for a competent government and it will be solved. He said that if you do politics for a long time, you're always angry.

■ Powerbook: I watched TV carefully the moment I said that today. I looked closely at the president's expression, and the president is also a very poor position. If a friend who has been raising him for 20 years puts an angle on his power, he will think that he will gain popularity, and now he makes an angle with President Yoon, saying, "This is a chance." Then, in my view, there are already people next to CEO Han Dong-hoon. It is in my opinion. Only the heirs who say only things that are good to hear and never say things that are hard to say are making me cry. It's amazing when you look at it. I think CEO Lee Han Dong-hoon will have an opportunity if he pushes forward with the behavior he has done now, but it's welcome. It seems to me. Eventually, the major division of the ruling camp and most of the political landscape will happen. Of course, the Democratic Party is almost upheaval in November right now. Lee Jae-myung is now in a corner unless he is likely to appear innocent in the perjury teacher trial on the 25th of the Public Official Election Act on the 15th. So there is an upheaval that shakes both sides. If representative Han Dong-hoon is a bit politically mature at times like this, I'm in a position to help the president now. However, it is a little wrong to say that it is the people's people who are enormous to them to attack the president now after angling against the president. They understand it as a border that gathers a certain personality of the public. I'm making a bit of a wrong judgment. So I'm watching closely. He really doesn't have a chance with that. I told you once here, but there are 3Ks, not to mention Lee Jae-myung of the Democratic Party. Kim Dong-hyun and Kim Kyung-soo, I heard they met secretly in Germany this time, and from Han Dong-hoon, the mayor of Hong Joon Pyo in Daegu over there, and Oh Se-hoon in Seoul all have 1 supporter, and the opposition is 1 times 2 plus alpha. It's more than double. None of them are gathering the public's trust. You know that when you think about it.

◇ Choi Soo-young: Do you think today's press conference will serve as an opportunity to rebound the president's approval rating, which has fallen to the 10% range? Do you think it will be difficult?

■ Powerbook: Basically, the economic situation needs to improve if the president's support is to rebound. That's the basics. Jobs should be increased, income should be increased, and above all, the gap should be narrowed. Complaints are reduced only when the gap between the rich and the poor is reduced. However, the rich are still rich, but poor households continue to increase their deficit. Something really heartbreaking is happening everywhere now. Self-employed people are collapsing right now. I think it's difficult. I think this time, Gallup will also come out in the mid-to-late 10% range again.

◆ Lee Ik-seon: Thank you for your words. I was with lawyer Jeon Won-chaek and monthly Jeon Won-chaek. Thank you for today.

■ Powerbook: Yes, thank you.