Controversy over the bulletin board of the People's Power Party...Han Dong-hoon, "Unnecessary self-destruction".

■ Host: Kim Sun-young Anchor
■ Starring: Attorney Lee Seung-hoon, Attorney Seo Jeong-wook

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN NewsNOW] when quoting.

[Anchor]
Political commentary with a living angle, let's start at the minute. Today, two lawyers came out. Lawyer Seo Jeong-wook and lawyer Lee Seung-hoon. Welcome. Let's start with the first keyword today. It's an unnecessary self-destruction. Representative Han Dong-hoon used this expression to reporters today in connection with the controversy over the party bulletin board. Let's hear what they said first.

[Anchor]
Is it time for us to fight the party bulletin board? We've heard CEO Han Dong-hoon's story. Anyway, the party leader's position regarding the controversy over the party bulletin board came out, do you think it was a refreshing explanation?

[Jungwook Seo]
Not at all. I heard that the party announced legal action, but as far as I know, there are conservative YouTubers who attack CEO Han Dong-hoon. He warned me that he would take legal action on this side. This is not the essence at all. Then, who on earth did Jajung-ran happen to? You're causing a self-inflicted disturbance. When Han Dong-hoon came out as CEO in the past, there were eight Han Dong-hoon who had the same name. How did you know that there are eight Han Dong-hoons? I searched their various personal information, so there were eight people with the same name and there was no Han Dong-hoon in 73 years. Don't you think they've figured this out? Then, if you check in the same way this time, whether Jin Eun-jung is her wife, Jin Eun-jung with the same name, or whether it was stolen from her. Couples live together in the same room every day. You, is that yours? Isn't it you? Then this was stolen. Hurry up and sue. Do I have to drag this out for more than 20 days? If this happens, all of my doubts become a fait accompli as Han Dong-hoon's family. Or they would have sued or responded at the speed of light.

[Anchor]
It's not a family. You're telling me like this, right?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's right. You can check that out because it's a family. But you can't say that. It's stolen, it's the same name. You did it in your own time. But isn't it because it's right that you can't say that? You get this kind of suspicion. If you get hit, you'll respond as soon as you get hit, but it's not a matter of dragging your feet like this. I believe that this self-destruction is entirely due to CEO Han Dong-hoon himself.

[Anchor]
In any case, the controversy over the party's bulletin board is growing, and representative Han Dong-hoon continues to remain silent. There seems to be a growing criticism that there is no quick explanation. If we collect the remarks that have been made so far and deliver them, there are a number of important issues on the 14th. In such a situation, I answered that there is no need to create a conflict and promote division.
I already told you when reporters asked me again on the 19th. I answered briefly like this. Yesterday, I said I wouldn't get 100ble, but today, I answered like this. I think there are a lot of people saying that it's not like Han Dong-hoon or that it's an answer that's not like Han Dong-hoon.

[Lee Seung Hoon]
So CEO Han Dong-hoon is new to politics. If you listen to the writing, you can see what's inside. He said he wasn't. That means family is right. In that respect, the inside is revealed, and then we need to do a party audit or investigation, what should we do? Is this the country of Kim Gun-hee, is Kim Gun-hee the president, is this the content, or is it quoting editorials or columns? If you're grateful for something like this, shouldn't all the party members be thankful for it? Then you don't have to make a bulletin board itself. This bulletin board is about talking about yourself without any addition or subtraction. If you criticize the bulletin board, shouldn't you change it like this, saying that even if you close the bulletin board if you are thankful for it, or even if it is not a crime of defamation or insult, if you criticize the president, this will be punished? In that respect, I think it is to drive out Han Dong-hoon, who is not the subject of discussion, because his approval rating seems to be rising a little to drive out representative Han Dong-hoon from Yongsan again.

[Anchor]
You mentioned the controversial bulletin board posts for a while, and we'll organize them for you. So, was there such a first lady in the history of the conservative government in the post under the name of author Han Dong-hoon? I won't read them one by one. That's what it contains. In the article posted in the mother's statement, there was a text saying, "Is Kim Gun-hee the president and Yoon Suk Yeol the president is an avatar?" These are the posts you're looking at. Lawyer Seo Jeong-wook, can't you post something like this on the party's bulletin board? There are people who ask back like that.

[Jungwook Seo]
I think lawyer Lee Seung-hoon misunderstood the essence. The essence is that there is a problem with the transaction, and you can post any criticism like that.

[Anchor]
The content doesn't matter?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's how I see it. But the problem is that a specific organization, one person, can use multiple ID accounts, 10 or 100 accounts to manipulate public opinion systematically. Why are you pardoning Kim Kyung-soo? Don't pardon me. If you post a large-scale article like this, you can mislead public opinion like this, saying that the will of all party members is against amnesty, but the president does it. This is a violation of democracy. Of course, if CEO Han Dong-hoon's family members are correct, think about posting such posts. It's also inappropriate for the leader of the ruling party to attack the president with family accounts. I see it as the act. I don't know if it's a legal issue. Even more serious than that is manipulating public opinion with multiple accounts, which is against party democracy. Drooking isn't necessarily because of macro or king crab. I'm trying to systematically change the direction of public opinion. Representative Han Dong-hoon once quoted this saying, "This is what the actual party members mean." It's been reported before.

[Anchor]
You don't know if it's done by one organization or if it's posted by several people, right?

[Jungwook Seo]
So, the investigation... Since the account is suspicious, when it came up. I don't think everyone's family writes on CEO Han Dong-hoon's family account. There may be a manager who manages this. If they use everything to raise it systematically, this is the will of the entire party, and this is a serious problem. It's the essence.

[Anchor]
It's not really written by the family, but it's possible that someone managed the family account and manipulated public opinion, so do you see it like this?

[Jungwook Seo]
Representatively, when Kim Kyung-soo was pardoned at the time, representative Han Dong-hoon said, "What's wrong with the president?"
But those things pop up on the bulletin board. Then the entire party is overwhelmingly against it. Amnesty is the president's own authority. This is how public opinion is manipulated. This is the problem.

[Anchor]
The key is manipulation of public opinion. How do you watch this?

[Lee Seung Hoon]
There's a way to manipulate public opinion. For example, there's a machine called King Crab using Druking. It is illegal for machines to continue manipulating unfavorable public opinion with it, but for example, supporters of Yongsan gather and criticize representative Han Dong-hoon. Is this a manipulation of public opinion? Likewise, people who support Han Dong-hoon systematically criticize Yongsan, but that does not mean that public opinion cannot be manipulated. In the end, when you criticize someone, the blame goes to the person who did the wrong thing. The media is purified through it, and this cannot be seen as a manipulation just by the criticism itself. In that regard, if this is a manipulation of public opinion and it is illegal, wouldn't it be right to investigate the party's bulletin board with Yongsan supporters?

[Anchor]
Daegu Mayor Hong Joon Pyo also criticized Druking for manipulating public opinion, mentioning him, but lawyer, at this point, Druking manipulated public opinion to use it for the election, and what purpose is it to manipulate public opinion on the party's bulletin board? I think there's also this perspective.

[Jungwook Seo]
It will probably be difficult to manipulate the entire public opinion. There aren't that many people approaching it. I mean the party members, it's perfect for manipulating the public opinion of the party members. But you can't manipulate it with just that writing. Why? We don't see each other that much. But CEO Han Dong-hoon should mention it. For example, there are many accounts, and as I gave an example earlier, if such posts are just posted, CEO Han Dong-hoon looks at the party bulletin board. If you say, "Isn't there an overwhelming number of opposition to the articles?" the media will respond when CEO Han Dong-hoon says something. Members of the People's Power Party are saying this.

[Anchor]
Not all such specific circumstances have been confirmed, have they?

[Jungwook Seo]
I can't tell you a specific media company now, but it's been mentioned a few times and has been reported. Even if it's not an election like this, there are many pending issues. For example, stop external activities of First Lady Kim Gun-hee. This systematically posts on the party's bulletin board saying, "Stop Kim Gun-hee's activities." Then, look at representative Han Dong-hoon, if the overwhelming intention of the party members is to stop Kim Gun-hee's activities, there are media outlets that accept it. In this way, the opinions of party members can be at least manipulated.

[Anchor]
However, some point out that the existence of this bulletin board will be meaningless if someone goes into the party audit and writes something and becomes known.

[Lee Seung Hoon]
That's right. In the case of CEO Lee Jae-myung, you should also post criticisms and swear words on the bulletin board. You said that's the only way you can refer to it when implementing policies. However, if you do a party audit just because an article criticizing Yongsan was posted, you have to continue to audit the party, such as those who criticize Representative Kwon Sung-dong and those who criticize Representative Han Dong-hoon. Then, is there anyone left behind by the party members? Wouldn't you go to the mountain if all of you were suspended and deprived of your party membership? I don't know if Lee Jae-myung thinks he was given a chance quickly because he is convicted in the first trial of the Public Official Election Act, but don't say anything about the party's bulletin board now. I think it would be right for the ruling party or the president's office to grasp the public sentiment of the work.

[Anchor]
In a media interview today, Jang Ye-chan, a former supreme council member who claims that the party's spouse is the mastermind, argued that Han Dong-hoon should take responsibility if his family wrote it. Let's listen to it.

[Anchor]
We don't know what's true, but anyway, CEO Han Dong-hoon's family really wrote such a thing on the bulletin board, what kind of problem would it be if it was revealed like this?

[Jungwook Seo]
Then there's no problem. I mean, so proudly, for example, my wife, my father-in-law, and my mother-in-law were right, and I wrote accordingly. Then what's wrong with swearing at the president, if you're this confident, there may be a political battle, but I don't think there's a legal problem. But even Supreme Council member Kim Jong-hyuk is wrong about the anonymous bulletin board. Anonymous bulletin boards are used as they please, and this is a bulletin board that has been verified by real name, but it only displays Han OO and Jin OO.

[Anchor]
It wasn't supposed to be searched for names.

[Jungwook Seo]
But the bulletin board that authenticates the real name is written under my name when the search and seizure come in. It can be released someday, like a warrant. It is not completely anonymous. Let me tell you this. It's not because of the article criticizing the president. There is a team like this that borrows multiple accounts to systematically draw public opinion in one direction. I'm raising a problem now because of this suspicion. I rather don't think it's a big problem for CEO Han Dong-hoon's family to proudly swear at President Yoon or Kim Gun-hee.

[Anchor]
Former Supreme Council member Jang Ye-chan said that if it turns out to be true, his political life will almost be cut off.

[Lee Seung Hoon]
It's a very scary thing to say. If you criticize someone and your political life is cut off, this is not a democratic party. I think this is a bit serious. Han Dong-hoon's family criticized the president and his family. Morally, it seems that it can be a problem. Nevertheless, the president's approval rating was once less than 20%. Kim Geon-hee said, "We should not travel outside, we should not do public activities, or we should renovate our personnel."Isn't it what the majority of the people wanted to say that Eden needs to find out the suspicions? Nevertheless, there was a lot of criticism about CEO Han Dong-hoon's request, canceling the dinner, and not meeting alone. We have to look at it from that point of view, but if we still drive out Han Dong-hoon, we will drive out Lee Joon-seok and Kim Ki-hyun. Now, if only CEO Han Dong-hoon is driven out, I think the representative I want can come. Who can be the representative I want when I don't have a public approval rating?

[Anchor]
Anyway, we told you the story of Jang Ye-chan, a former supreme council member who criticizes Han Dong-hoon, and I heard that Lee Joon-seok and Jang Ye-chan, who were originally bitter rivals, have become very close recently.

[Jungwook Seo]
But it's an immutable law because the enemy is a comrade. It worked because there was a common enemy as representative Han Dong-hoon, but this time, representative Han Dong-hoon was clearly on the defensive. Even if you think about it yourself, it's going to be painful. But at times like this, if I give advice to CEO Han Dong-hoon. In this case, throwing everything and being honest is the best policy. You can't drag yourself through here again or try to break through with lies. You have to explain everything to the people as it is and then be judged.

[Anchor]
Instead of waiting for the police investigation, you have to do a fact-finding investigation or reveal it yourself?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's right. Preemptively, this is a family, I think, if it's revealed through a party audit or a police investigation later. It's even more fatal. Even now, I think honesty is the best and everything is honest. It's golden time. You say that. The timing of Mrs. Kim Gun-hee's apology is also important. If representative Han Dong-hoon is real, it is necessary to reveal all this and apologize to the party members and the people.

[Anchor]
Don't say that.

[Jungwook Seo]
So if it's right. I mean, that's how you feel when you ask for an apology from Mrs. Kim Gun-hee, do you say yes or no? It's not a good act to make it clear whether it's my family or theft, and if you just criticize it for that reason, it's not a good act. The fact that the party leader's family systematically criticized the president. Then I'll apologize. You have to do it like this. Then, who is cutting off political life doesn't mean that the people and party members are going to become the next president after seeing this, or is the person who came out to say new politics using his family members to curse the president so meanly? If this happens, the people will end their political lives. That's how you have to be punished yourself.

[Anchor]
He said he would wait for the results of the police investigation, but if this happens, the leadership of the party leader will also be on the cutting board, but since unnecessary debates between factions continue to drag on, he needs to reveal whether he is yes or no.
How do you see it?

[Lee Seung Hoon]
This part is the same as lawyer Seo Jung-wook. It's time for CEO Han Dong-hoon to reveal it. I'm revealing it implicitly. Rather than saying so, it is not officially under Han Dong-hoon's name. However, there are some criticisms of President Yoon Suk Yeol in the name of his family, but what's the problem with that? There's nothing wrong. Criticize me, too. And criticize Yongsan as much as you want. I think we can say that the party bulletin board is such a place.

[Anchor]
However, as soon as you admit that fact, isn't there a problem with the image of CEO Han Dong-hoon among conservative supporters?

[Lee Seung Hoon]
But even if I don't, wouldn't it be recognized soon? I don't think I'll leave it still in Yongsan.

[Anchor]
It's an implied admission, but isn't it better to just say this openly? I think it's this kind of alternative, how do you see it?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's right now. It's an implied yes because you can't deny it, but rather than that, I'll be honest. And what's the problem, you can't go like this. Is it a good thing that all the family members use their accounts now to criticize the president and first lady? The president is the first member of the party. I am sorry to the people, to the party members. Even if you weren't involved with your family yourself, I would take responsibility and apologize. Then, we have to see if the party members will give us a chance once again, so we can't do this as if we didn't do anything wrong. Lawyer Lee Seung-hoon keeps telling me to swear on the bulletin board while talking about Lee Jae-myung, but it doesn't make sense because Mr. Baek was expelled after criticizing Lee Jae-myung. Friendship is on YouTube. Some people have been expelled for sanctioning party members. While swearing at CEO Lee Jae-myung. [Anchor] Anyway, the two of you are pushing me too much that CEO Han Dong-hoon said an implied yes, so as a host, no one can know the truth. Let's wrap it up like this and move on to the next keyword. Please show us. without evidence The prosecution indicted me again. Representative Lee Jae-myung has expressed his position on the additional indictment in connection with the alleged misappropriation of corporate cards in Gyeonggi Province. Let's hear what you're talking about first.

[Anchor]
Buy beef, buy fruit, scratch the corporate card, there's no evidence I knew. It was prosecuted again without evidence. CEO Lee Jae-myung refuted it like this, right?

[Lee Seung Hoon]
Kim Hye-kyung has apologized for this in the past. I'm sorry for the poor management of Mr. Bae's behavior. In addition, some were indicted on the Public Official Election Act and convicted in the first trial. I apologized for that, but I think it was a criticism that Lee Jae-myung criticized the prosecution because there was no direct evidence even for the part that he was not involved in. In fact, the Genesis car was parked at Kim Hye-kyung's house, and the entire lease fee for the vehicle was prosecuted with just this. However, we need to examine whether it was used publicly or privately, how many days this car was parked, and various things, but I think they just prosecuted the entire lease fee with a barrel. So this part is probably difficult to prove, so there is a very high possibility of an acquittal. In this way, I think Lee Jae-myung is criticizing that because it seems to be a prosecution at this level, first prosecution, then look at it, and then make the image of Lee Jae-myung bad.

[Anchor]
He was indicted without solid evidence. I will be similar to President Lula. So I think it's this argument that you'll be innocent in the end.

[Jungwook Seo]
Has CEO Lee Jae-myung gone to the prosecution now to see if there is evidence or not? The prosecution told me to come, but I refused to summon him. Kim Hye-kyung's trial election law. This is a similar case, company card. There are only 26,000 pages of litigation records. There is a huge amount of evidence piled up on 26,000 pages, did you copy the record yourself and see it? I don't even know what evidence the prosecution is holding, but only representative evidence, Cho Myung-hee. Cho Myung-hyun, you've been investigated more than 10 times, investigating and recording everything. If you look there, buy Japanese shampoo in Cheongdam-dong. If you buy it, the official will send you cash again. Then, I also researched the civil servants. In addition, Cho Myoung-hyun's former female civil servant is now retired, but she investigated again. Then, from those processes, a chief of staff has been charged as a representative. So why does the chief of staff write down all the details falsely? I think the chief of staff is unfair. Then the company card is... I'll sign the law firm's law firm as a representative. Lee Jae-myung's representative corporate card will be caught by Lee Jae-myung after the representative Lee Jae-myung looks at the contents, and if a public official buys a drink personally, he will catch Lee Jae-myung. And CEO Lee Jae-myung will fire him. That's how thoroughly I check it. But he only did what he did, which is the most certain thing. Mr. Bae is 138,000. Among them, Lee Jae-myung's representative Lee Jae-myung has been indicted only. So I have 26,000 pages of records, numerous witnesses, and then the chief of staff was indicted, and now I have no evidence? This doesn't make sense. That's the same with official cars. There's a car that you ride. By the way, your wife's car got a parking lot next to you, stayed there, checked the diary details, and prosecutors prosecuted. If the prosecution is not guilty after sloppy prosecution of Lee Jae-myung, will you be responsible?

[Anchor]
The prosecution must have secured evidence that the governor knew at the time, and this is the view. Representative Lee Jae-myung said this after the first trial ruling. The Public Official Election Act is too restrictive. I said that I need to change this, but since I have been sentenced to the first trial of the election law, I think there is a suspicion that the claim to amend this law is too related to personal interests.

[Lee Seung Hoon]
For example, a fine of more than 1 million won will invalidate the election, but I will change it to 10 million won. If this happens, we can accuse CEO Lee Jae-myung of being personal. But shouldn't the judge sentence this part to probation?
So I would like to say that this revision of the law itself is not appropriate from the perspective of the people of this time. However, have you ever seen a ruling like this in which the party throws up 43.4 billion won? This is jeopardizing the existence of the opposition itself. Therefore, in this case, the individual representative Lee Jae-myung defends on his own and the Democratic Party of Korea has the amount to be recovered, so it is necessary to amend the law called auxiliary participation in criminal matters so that the Democratic Party can defend itself. Otherwise, the Democratic Party of Korea will be taken back as per the ruling without expressing any position, and the existence of the party will be at stake and we will have to sell it. So these procedural issues. In addition, it seems necessary to revise the Public Official Election Act so that freedom of expression can be widely recognized as much as possible in the remarks of politicians.

[Anchor]
Han Dong-hoon, the representative of the People's Power, said this this morning about the Democratic Party's move that the Public Official Election Act itself should be changed. Let's listen to it first. Let's get rid of the crime of publicizing false information. It is said that the bill proposed by the Democratic Party of Korea contains such content, how do you view it?

[Jungwook Seo]
It's not the first time, but the Democratic Party members held a public hearing not long ago. Right now, false facts should not be false about property, educational background, or criminal record. But if you look at it now, it says that it's an act of property, transfer, and education.
Punishes one's actions even if they are false. CEO Lee Jae-myung got caught there. Because of the threat from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, it was raised to level 4, which is an act. But the problem is this act, let's delete it. In this case, it is difficult to punish Lee Jae-myung. What about our country's laws? In general, punishment is not retroactive. It's generally a fluoride-grade principle. However, if the punishment clause is removed in favor of the person concerned, it is retroactive. That's why they're supposed to be acquitted. free from prosecution Then, if the law were to announce false information, the part of the act was deleted. However, it is before the Supreme Court of Representative Lee Jae-myung has been confirmed. In this case, the court will be dismissed.

[Anchor]
What's going to happen at the appeals court right now?

[Jungwook Seo]
You have to be acquitted at the appeal trial, if the law is passed.

[Anchor]
So you're not guilty?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's right. For example, if you're having an adultery and you're having a trial, and the crime of adultery has been abolished, you're excused. It's the same thing. So I think this is a huge conspiracy. Why should the No. 1 beneficiary be Lee Jae-myung's representative? In the past, Minister Cho Kuk also changed the public information rules, and it is Lee Jae-myung who is the first beneficiary of the Political Affairs and Communications Department who changed the law this time and benefited from it as the first. This doesn't make sense. Originally, I had this discussion at the National Assembly. There is a wide range of false information. There was a discussion to narrow it down, but this is that CEO Lee Jae-myung should not benefit from No. 1.

[Anchor]
It can be different already, right?

[Jungwook Seo]
That's right. If the law goes fast. But is the bill going to be fast? There's a presidential veto.

[Anchor]
No matter how much the Democratic Party tries to push for it, won't it be more likely to veto it? [Lee Seunghoon] I'm going to veto it. Because I was elected president. But in the future, all those who lose the presidential election will be guilty of publicizing false information. When President Yoon Suk Yeol said that his mother-in-law never harmed him by a ten-won bill when he was a candidate, then let's search and seizure. Then, the mother-in-law was forged about 34 billion private documents. And it was caught as a name trust for a penalty of 2.7 billion won. Then, if your mother-in-law has never harmed you by 10 won, but if you say you caused damage, this is a false announcement. So if the prosecution, Yoon Seok-yeol, is investigating with this much pressure, all those who lost the presidential election will be deprived of their right to run for election due to the publication of false information, so if you think about the future, you will need to think seriously.

[Anchor]
In any case, the Democratic Party is even moving to revise the election law. Representative Lee Jae-myung seems to be responding to judicial risks, but he appointed lawmaker Lee Kun-tae as his legal representative. What does it mean to have a legal representative?

[Jungwook Seo]
I'm a legal representative. in the history of a party I've never heard of...

[Anchor]
Was there a position like this originally, a legal representative?

[Jungwook Seo]
As far as I know, I have never heard of such a position in the history of Korea. How can a lawmaker, the representative of the people, be a spokesperson for Lee Jae-myung's individual, no matter how represented, regarding the individual's judicial risk, and a spokesperson for the public party.

[Anchor]
I heard he was in charge of defending Daejang-dong.

[Jungwook Seo]
That's lawyer Jeong Ji-sang. Among the two in Bucheon, Rep. Kim Ki-pyo was Kim Yong, followed by Rep. Lee Kun-tae, who defended Jeong Jin-sang. But if you have any questions about Lee Jae-myung's judicial risk, ask Lee Kun-tae, a lawmaker, if journalists are curious. I don't have a spokesperson like this. Perhaps the reason is that the Democratic Party should also return 43.4 billion won.
It's probably because of this, but I think 43.4 billion won is incidentally followed by the effect of the law, but no matter how much, I have a spokesman for Lee Jae-myung's personal case, which I don't understand.

[Anchor]
It is the money that goes into the personal defense of Lee Jae-myung with a legal representative. Then, will the party be able to apply for such defense expenses? What do you think?

[Lee Seung Hoon]
First of all, the legal representative is the spokesperson, so the other spokesperson is actually difficult to represent because the legal matter is too complicated. So, the question of whether the party can apply after saying that he had a legal representative is, for example, to enter the criminal case as a lawyer for representative Lee Jae-myung. Then it could be an act of donation under the Political Fund Act.
If it doesn't work, you have to provide legal advice, but the Democratic Party of Korea is in a very pitiful situation with legal advice alone, so I think it is necessary to apply for a criminal assistance system so that the Democratic Party can represent itself in the name of the Democratic Party.

[Jungwook Seo]
It's clearly illegal because it's the same as Samsung Group paying for Vice Chairman Lee Jae-yong's lawyer, for example. The Democratic Party of Korea will pay for Lee Jae-myung's personal lawyer? That doesn't make sense. I mean, if that happens, I'll be under the Political Fund Act, but I have embezzlement and breach of trust under the criminal law. Why do you give the public party's funds to Lee Jae-myung's personal lawyer? This is clearly illegal.

[Anchor]
Lawyer Seo Jeong-wook, finally, the decision to disallow the perjury teacher's trial was made. What do you think this means?

[Jungwook Seo]
The election law was also not allowed because it was done for the benefit of Lee Jae-myung. I can expect Jung Han again this time. But if you broadcast it, it'll kill you. I think it's the same purpose as the election law. Since the election law was disallowed, I do not, but I predict that a serious sentence will come out.

[Anchor]
It's a personal prospect that a medium-sized one will come out. I'll organize it like that. So far, it has been lawyer Seo Jung-wook and lawyer Lee Seung-hoon. Thank you.