Controversy over 'Deutsche seizure and search' false explanation..."Misunderstanding" by the prosecution.

As it was confirmed that the prosecution never requested a search warrant for Kim in the Deutsche Motors stock price manipulation case, controversy arose over the "false" that it was different from the briefing explanation the day before.

Lee Chang-soo, head of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, said in a parliamentary audit of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office of the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee on the 18th, "I was not lying, but I was briefed after the fact."

In response, Seo Young-kyo, a lawmaker of the Democratic Party of Korea, said, "It is a fraud of the people," and that he will submit data on what kind of search warrant was requested and rejected.

When asked by Cho Bae-sook, a member of the People's Power, if he had given a false briefing, the district attorney said, "I never gave a false briefing," and explained that there was a misunderstanding in the process of communicating with reporters.

Earlier, Choi Jae-hoon, head of the anti-corruption investigation department at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, said in a briefing yesterday (17th) that "We sought warrants for seizure and search of Kim's residence, office and mobile phone in November 2020 while conducting a Deutsche investigation with Kobana, but all were rejected."