[Talking] Shin Ji-ho, "Chin Yun-do is a sense of self-destruction." Kim Jae-won, "Are you going to build Han Dong-hoon's negotiation? Close to the hostage drama of Myung Tae-kyun."

After the prosecution's indictment of Kim Gun-hee's alleged manipulation of Deutsche Motors' stock price, the political community's reaction was heated.

Once again, a fierce battle is expected between the ruling and opposition parties over the Special Prosecutor Kim's Act.

Shin Ji-ho, the head of the People's Power Strategy and Planning Department, who is pro-limit, argued that even among pro-Yoon lawmakers, he feels a sense of shame, and evaluated that the situation will change a lot depending on the meeting between representative Han and president Yoon alone.

[Shin Ji-ho, Secretary-General of the Strategic Planning Department (MBC Kim Jong-bae's attention): There are predictions that so-called close lawmakers may oppose it, but it's not necessarily that. Personally, I talked to pro-Yoon-gye lawmakers or lawmakers in the middle of the country, but I want to do something nationally meaningful in private, but it's not just once or twice that I'm defending the first lady, so I feel humiliated. Something like this. // (I wonder if you just said that there might be more leave votes than the 4 votes that came out last time during the re-decision process, how can you tell me?) That's unpredictable. Didn't Han Dong-hoon announce three other demands yesterday about the outcome of the meeting between the president and representative Han Dong-hoon scheduled for early next week? I think it will vary a lot depending on how the presidential office reacts to it.

Ahead of the meeting with the president, representative Han Dong-hoon also publicly stated three demands, saying that Mrs. Kim should stop her external activities.

Supreme Council member Kim Jae-won pointed out that it is the first time in more than 20 years of political life and that he is going to negotiate.

In addition, regarding the recent battle with Myung Tae-kyun, he emphasized that we should approach carefully when there is a hostage crisis. Let's listen to it.

[Kim Jae-won / Supreme Council member of People's Power (YTN News Fighting): Anyway, it's the first time in my 21st year of political life that the ruling party leader openly mentioned the issue of the first lady to the president. That's why it's very burdensome. // Changes in the president's office and the president's office should be made practically. If I had tried to do that, wouldn't I have been much more receptive if I had talked more honestly at the meeting scheduled for early next week? If you go in a situation like this openly, you're going to negotiate now. Personally, I think it would have been better to do it in a private meeting when you made such a presentation. If I continue to do about Myung Tae-kyun, the victim will be mass-produced. First of all, I think it's right to refrain. If there is a hostage crisis, we have to approach it carefully first, but don't you think things get bigger by trying too hard? That was the explanation.]

After the indictment of Kim Gun-hee, the opposition party's offensive intensified.

The Democratic Party expanded its scope of investigation with a stronger independent counsel law.

Rep. Lee Sung-yoon of the Democratic Party, a former chief of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, also explained the background of the impeachment of the prosecutor general and the chief of the Central District Prosecutors' Office, saying that the president can also investigate.

[Lee Sung-yoon of the Democratic Party (SBS Kim Tae-hyun's political show): (Then, President Yoon Suk Yeol will also be on the list of investigators. Is this what you mean?) I'll do it if I need it. The president, too. The president can't prosecute under the constitution, but he can investigate.

Wasn't there an invalid vote when the special prosecution law was re-decided last time? Actually, I think that's 'ga' too. But as the ruling party lawmakers talk more and more, in private, it's very... How should I say this? I am unhappy with the successive rejection of the Special Counsel Act.

But would many people agree with this behavior of the prosecution? Would there be a lot of people against it? I think the public will overwhelmingly criticize this as a false investigation. If we impeach this way, we don't investigate the prosecution, we don't discipline those problematic prosecutors, so what are the people given to us? We only have the power to impeach. That's why Congress is impeaching.]