"I'll finish it within this week." Democratic Party...What card will the power of the people use? [Y Record]

■ Host: Anchor Cho Jin-hyuk
■ Starring: Park Sang-gyu, current affairs critic, Park Chang-hwan, special professor at Jangan University

* The text below may differ from the actual broadcast content, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information. Please specify [YTN News UP] when quoting.

◆ Anchor
The professor pointed out the dragging of time earlier, but the constitutional judge's confirmation hearing will also begin today. However, the Democratic Party of Korea is in a position to finish the process within this week, and it seems that the power of the people will take out the judgment card for the power dispute. What do you think?

◇ Park Changhwan
It is up to the ruling party to decide whether or not to dispute the authority. Who's going to stop it when they say they're going to argue? But there is a point for the ruling party to think about. The fact that the party, which rejected the demands of the people, rejected the demands of the people, refused to lift martial law according to its own partisan interests, and rejected the impeachment by saying that it would hold another trial in such a power dispute with President Yoon Suk Yeol is no different from the people's view now. Apart from the people's power advocating martial law and civil war, they are saying that they will increase the clock of confusion in state affairs indefinitely.

In Korea, when I saw people protesting on the streets with cheering sticks on the streets about the martial law civil war, I thought that the Republic of Korea is really leading the world's democracy, but the politicians stepped up and asked for such aspirations and demands. What kind of choice will these parts be given to the people when they hide their partisan interests in the legal, so-called judicial system while defying the orders of the sovereign people? In the end, I think I have no choice but to face headwinds. Of course, you can say that you have to think about what to think about. However, it is also necessary to maintain the big framework of protecting the constitution.

If the people's power was active in lifting martial law and impeachment is inevitable, let's judge that this martial law and civil war cannot happen, but let's argue about legal issues. In this way, for example, if you did something like the appointment of a constitutional judge now, you would be less beaten. However, anyone can see that advocating or protecting martial law and civil war, and dragging the time as if they were playing a three-way match with President Yoon Suk Yeol amid these nuances, will inevitably face a backlash from the people.

◇ Park Sang-gyu The Constitutional Judge's confirmation hearing is originally 1+1+1. One person is supposed to be elected by agreement between the ruling and opposition parties. Of course, it is said that floor leader Choo Kyung-ho agreed on this before, but rather than an agreement at that time, the Democratic Party of Korea made it 2:1 with a huge seat ahead. So the ruling and opposition parties agreed to appoint one person, but the Democratic Party of Korea refused and is pushing ahead with numbers. Moreover, you're saying you're going to make the two of them this morning and afternoon. I'm telling you again, in the case of a de facto civilian like the president of KBS, and Lee Jin-sook, the chairman of the Korea Communications Commission, he did it for three days. However, one person will finish before lunch and the other person will finish before dinner, and the lawyer recommending people's strength will be appointed separately for a day. The shape of this is also unacceptable.

And now, the chairman of the special committee, Chung Sang-sik, a member of the People's Power Party, says he will not do it, so it is an urgent hearing for the Democratic Party of Korea to put in Park Ji-won. After doing that, they are asking us to appoint them all on the 27th. In democracy, numbers are of course important.There's a device for a small number of people. It's not even an absolute minority. 108 seats is not a small one. As you go in, you can proceed with it by agreement, and do it on the 27th unconditionally and appoint it as if you're nailing a date. This keeps showing me arrogant. I know it's urgent, but there's a saying that the more urgent it is, the more you should go back. Needles can never be used at the waist. It keeps falling out. I want to point out that.

Excerpted from
: Yoon Hyun-kyung, Editor of the Digital News Team
#Y Record